Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:04 AM
it's all dodge it's all dodge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Harrison,Ark
Posts: 1,441
Default E85 and supercharged or turbo'd?

All this talk about E 85 and the compression it'll support, makes you wonder, can you run maybe 7 pounds of boost on a 8-8.5 to 1 engine, in a towing rig? or more? Something like a 318 stroked to 4", since small bore engines are better about less detonation? With regular or prem. gas, it usually aint adviced, atleast in a towing rig. I aint got the money for it, just wonder how it would work, see what opinions are
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:23 AM
TrashedCharger's Avatar
TrashedCharger TrashedCharger is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Co.
Age: 42
Posts: 675
Default

I think you can go to 8psi safely in a relatively stock v8. Any higher than that and you should start looking into custom head gaskets. The reason that the inline six motors can handle more boost without a metal head gasket is because they have more head bolts.

When you start stroking an engine, you increase compression. I think you would be better off with a 360. Those are a 4" stroke from the start and most have an advertised compression ratio of no more than 8.5:1 The actual compression is less than that. Usually down in the high 7's to 8:1 flat, unless you have an early '72 or late '71 dated 360. Those were higher compression. Something around 9:1 - 9.25:1.

I think the reason that smaller bores do well with detonation is because they usually get their cubic displacement from stroke, rather than bore size. Simply put, because of that, the engine has more leverage and it's easier for the combustion to move that crankshaft in the direction that it should.

For whatever it's worth, I'm going to run E85 in my Charger and it's getting boosted, via a ProCharger.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:34 AM
kick_the_reverb kick_the_reverb is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Formerly Herzelia, Israel, now San Diego, CA
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrashedCharger View Post
I think you would be better off with a 360. Those are a 4" stroke from the start and most have an advertised compression ratio of no more than 8.5:1 The actual compression is less than that. Usually down in the high 7's to 8:1 flat, unless you have an early '72 or late '71 dated 360. Those were higher compression. Something around 9:1 - 9.25:1.

Some magical 360 you have there. Every Mopar 360 came from the factory with a 3.58" stroke (as opposed to 273/318/340 which had 3.31").
I also doubt the statement about the high compression in the early years, but I don't have the time to look that up now. Anyway, it's not good to assume anything about compression ratio, always measure and calculate what you have.

Ran
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2007, 11:52 AM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

The super charger store advertisement has a kit for this.
In theroy, it should make some excellent power.
I so no reason why it wouldn't. Same rules apply. More fuel, more spark, under more squeezzzzee. LOL = Zooooooooooooom!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2007, 02:32 AM
it's all dodge it's all dodge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Harrison,Ark
Posts: 1,441
Default

thought this thread was dead! Actually, since I'm talking a TRUCK engine, (low speed power!) say for hauling a trailer, I would take the more stroke than bore approach, worked for 2.2s and 2.5s, Course, the common block 2.5s were limited to a rod stroke ratio about as low as a 400 Chevy, either 318 or, a 273 with a 4 inch stroke! Since a person would need custom pistons anyway. I'm not very Cummins 6 cyl knowledgeable, seems they are also less bore than stroke?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:38 PM
JVMopar's Avatar
JVMopar JVMopar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mellen, WI
Age: 43
Posts: 2,524
Default

We had a E-85 supercharged 5.3 silverado when I was in college. 480 hp at the wheels (clayton dyno). I don't remember much (almost 10 years ago and it was a GM) except they milled the heads and had to add an extra fuel pump and 4 injectors for when the boost got high. I would guess 6 - 8 psi of boost and I'm sure the stock 5.3 was a 9:1 motor to start with. Hmmm time to buy a turbo car and some common blocks and do some testing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twin Turbo, Supercharged, and Nitrous chevykillr Dakota Truck Forum 8 12-21-2001 09:47 PM
Cam for a supercharged 318 Darknight Performance Talk 30 12-04-2001 12:35 AM
Mopar Performance Turbo Computer for '89 2.2L Turbo II (manual trans) tornqvis Front Wheel Drive - Parts Wanted 0 09-06-2001 05:29 AM
Supercharged 318 Lasalles Performance Talk 3 01-28-2001 02:26 AM
Supercharged V-10 BillyBob Ram Truck Chat 13 02-13-2000 04:56 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .