Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2008, 07:51 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default Need help with original 340 challenger!

Guys, I have an original 340 challenger r/t, 1971, with 32,000 original miles on it. Recently, there has been a ticking noise coming from under the hood, and I have finally pinpointed it I think, using a wooden dowel and lots of patience. The tick is loudest using the dowel on the timing mark directly beside/behind the balancer. The balancer and pulley are original. My question is, if a balancer is bad, would it cause the noise I am hearing? Any other ideas. It could be chain/sprocket, but with that low mileage I'm skeptical, especially as the rest of the timing chain cover does not produce the same amount of noise as right beside the balancer. By the way, this is not a knock, like a rod, but a very distinct tick, almost tinny sounding. At first I thought lifter, but the sound is very week at the intake and heads. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, I am trying to get it fixed for a big show on sunday. My buddy has the new challenger and we were going to park them side by side. Thanks in adance.

Will
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2008, 08:25 PM
wilks3 wilks3 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nashville,Illinois
Posts: 385
Default

Could it be the fuel pump or fuel pump rod?
Take the fuel pump off and start engine, it'll run long enough to see if noise goes away. My fuel pump rod was worn, didn't tick but caused fuel delievery problems.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2008, 08:54 PM
dodger1 dodger1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Princeton BC
Age: 86
Posts: 2,648
Default

No fuel pump rod on smallblocks, but it could be the pump arm/ eccentric contact area is damaged. Although that's a stretch. I can't think of how a damaged balancer would make such a noise either, but others here certainly have more experience than I do.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2008, 09:22 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default

yeah, the more I think about it, I think it must be the sprocket/chain or both. I just can't imagine with that low of mileage, but i've seen stranger things. Does anybody know if a 71 340 used a steel sprocket and chain, or if it was that nylon or whatever else they used?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2008, 10:09 PM
dodger1 dodger1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Princeton BC
Age: 86
Posts: 2,648
Default

According to "How to rebuild your small-block Mopar", all 340s had a 2-row roller chain, steel crank/iron cam sprockets. The comment is "slightly noisier but much more durable---" I have a Cloyes roller chain set in my 360, but never noticed any noise increase. Something to do with the leaky headers and unsilenced air cleaner, I suspect. Given the age of your 340, the chain may be noisy anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2008, 11:04 PM
DonCarr DonCarr is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Prescott, Canada
Age: 59
Posts: 242
Default vane idea

could the noise be a sticking vane in the power steering pump ?

Usually hydraulic lifters tick when gummed up or low oil pressure..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2008, 11:16 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default

I think I'm just going to take the timing chain cover off and see what I can find. This noise just appeared, it never made it before. It had 14,000 miles when dad bought it in 1995, it now has 32,000, and this is a first. Good thought on the power steering pump, but it is a manual steering car. Also oil pressure looks good, so I guess I'll see what I find out tomorrow. I just dont see how a double roller chain with iron sprockets could go bad after 32,000 miles, regardless of age?

Thanks,

Will
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-14-2008, 07:19 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default found the problem

Thanks for all your help, It was in fact the timing chain was shot. The chain was SCARY loose, and the cam actually jumped a tooth or two, but I got all that taken care of and fired up, and all is well. Thanks for your advice. Now on to the second part of the problem. The car surges at cruising speed and has a lack of power, and really falls on its face when you get on it, especially at high rpm. I think it is fuel pressure, as it doesn't do it nearly as bad if you rev it up to redline with the car parked. If it was timing or electrical, it would do it at all times I would think. Also, I have eliminated the carburetor as I have put a known good rebuilt thermoquad on it, and no change, although it starts much better now. I'm thinking the sending unit sock is shot, and is starving the engine. It is the factory pump, lines and tank, never been opened up. The lines are 5/16 also, which is probably not helping if the engine is starving already. I fabbed up a fuel pressure gauge into the cockpit, and after dinner. I plan on takin it down the road and seeing what it reads. I know you want fuel pressure around 7-7.5 psi, but my questions is should the pressure drop as rpm's increase, or should it be able to supply a steady 7 psi throughout the rpm band? Thanks for any help, this is the last thing to get this car road ready!

Will
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-14-2008, 09:34 PM
wilks3 wilks3 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nashville,Illinois
Posts: 385
Default

YIKES!!! Rev to redline in park? To me it would be time and money well spent to just change the fuel pump. How about just mounting fabbed up fuel pressure gauge to windshield wipers instead of inside by you?
If car still surges after pump change, change the sock out.
..........but what do I know, fuel pump rod on a small block.......sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-15-2008, 12:33 AM
aarracer aarracer is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 891
Default

Will

The thermoquad has an idiosyncrasy of having/mandatorily requiring a lower maximum fuel pressure.

There's some info/a thread here from Demon Sizzer under "Thermoquad's"that is the best!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-15-2008, 12:59 AM
Dick's Avatar
Dick Dick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Western NH
Age: 80
Posts: 8,880
Default

Are you sure the chain jumped a tooth or two? If you replaced the chain and hopefully sprockets and put it all back together, correcting the "jumped tooth or two," and now it has no power under load, I would suspect the cam timing was off.....maybe a tooth or two. It may have been right before.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-15-2008, 03:07 AM
Dart 65 Dart 65 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Scenic Xanthe Terra, Mars
Age: 51
Posts: 1,864
Default

I thought R/Ts were only big blocks.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-15-2008, 01:11 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default

Dick, this problem has been happening for a while, before I changed the chain and sprockets. The car acts just like it did before, only starts much easier and the total timing is back down to where it should be, around 35-36*. The suspected fuel problem has been this way for a year or two. This is why the car sat while other projects were finished. Now I have the time to fix it.
I may be wrong, but I dont think the chain and sprockets are related, and I am suspecting fuel starvation, either from a pinched line, clogged sending unit sock, or both. The tank has never been dropped off this car, and the car did sit for many years. Dad bought it in 1995 with only 14,700 miles on it, and the last inspection sticker was in 1976, so it did a lot of sitting around. Any other suggestions?

Dart 65, I think that in 1970 you could only get a big block in a challenger r/t, but in 71 they added the 340.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-16-2008, 06:19 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmade43 View Post
Also, I have eliminated the carburetor as I have put a known good rebuilt thermoquad on it, and no change, although it starts much better now. I'm thinking the sending unit sock is shot, and is starving the engine. It is the factory pump, lines and tank, never been opened up. The lines are 5/16 also, which is probably not helping if the engine is starving already. I fabbed up a fuel pressure gauge into the cockpit, and after dinner. I plan on takin it down the road and seeing what it reads. I know you want fuel pressure around 7-7.5 psi, but my questions is should the pressure drop as rpm's increase, or should it be able to supply a steady 7 psi throughout the rpm band? Thanks for any help, this is the last thing to get this car road ready!

Will
5/16th line wont starve the car at all. That's all it needs. We run the same line on our race car at over 400 hp and there's no starving issues due to the line size. Most everyone likes to go too big on the lines. A 3/8 line 400 plus hp cars would be the max you should ever need on a street car. Only six pack cars and Hemis got the 3/8 line anyways.

7psi is the max pressure for any carb. Your stock car should be about 4.5 to 6 psi. and it should read pretty steady.

A clean sock would not hurt. They tend to break up due to the fuel over the years. And they usually get sucked closed when you stand on it, but work fine under idle or cruise.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-17-2008, 07:40 AM
Dart 65 Dart 65 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Scenic Xanthe Terra, Mars
Age: 51
Posts: 1,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmade43 View Post
Dart 65, I think that in 1970 you could only get a big block in a challenger r/t, but in 71 they added the 340.
I'll see if I can find something in my library about this. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-21-2008, 08:11 PM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default

ok guys, I have the sending unit out of the gas tank, and I believe the unit is good, I have around 11 ohms at full, and around 73-75 ohms at empty. Can anyone confirm this is correct or not, so I don't buy a sending unit I don't need. Also, the sock looks nasty, and is probably part of the reason the engine is starving for fuel, but unfortunately I cannot find a replacement one at any of my parts stores. Have any of you bought one from your local parts stores or dealers, or is this a "year one only" type part?

Thanks,

Will
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:49 AM
BigBlockDude BigBlockDude is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 212
Default

I got a sock filter from the local dodge dealer before.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:22 AM
JVMopar's Avatar
JVMopar JVMopar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mellen, WI
Age: 43
Posts: 2,524
Default

Float setting could also cause your problem. or how about restricted needle and seat. Change the sock and fuel filter and drive it again. If you still have problems I'd pull the carb apart and check the float setting, check the needle and seat, and clean it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-02-2008, 03:09 PM
ehostler's Avatar
ehostler ehostler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Annandale, VA
Age: 57
Posts: 15,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmade43 View Post
Dart 65, I think that in 1970 you could only get a big block in a challenger r/t, but in 71 they added the 340.
That is correct
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-08-2008, 02:30 AM
moparmade43 moparmade43 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, OH
Posts: 15
Default

Found the problem, several of the cam lobes are wiped, and others are on their way. Thanks new oil!!!

Appreciate all your help guys, now comes the fun.

Will
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-23-2008, 01:32 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Over 7 fuel pressue seems too high. My dual feed 850 Holley does great on 6 psi. High fuel press can mess up a carbs performance.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-23-2008, 11:08 PM
70Ted 70Ted is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: upstate ny
Age: 61
Posts: 1,647
Default

and hope the cam debrie didnt kill the bearings. what oil was used?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Original Vintage 1971 Challenger/Cuda Race poster rastaswinger Rear Wheel Drive - Parts for Sale 2 10-22-2006 04:01 PM
1970 Challenger R/T 15k Original Miles Panther Pink Previous Owner Jessy James cornbread Rear Wheel Drive - Vehicles For Sale 0 10-18-2006 07:38 PM
1970 Challenger R/T 15k Original Miles Panther Pink Previous Owner Jessy James cornbread Vehicles for Sale 0 10-18-2006 07:36 PM
ORIGINAL 70 BODY IN WHITE CUDA OR CHALLENGER WANTED BIG RED MACHINE Rear Wheel Drive - Vehicles Wanted 0 01-04-2001 06:31 AM
Need info on original Cam for 1970 Challenger RT Lisa Performance Talk 7 09-06-2000 08:14 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .