Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2009, 01:07 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default 410 stroker hp & torque guesstimates

I saw valiant64's post and thought I'd get your opinions as well.

Heres the combo

bored/torque plated .040 over 360 block
KB hyper's set up at 9.8 compression
4' nodular scat crank
H beam floating pin rods
windage tray/valley baffle
fully ported j heads 2.02-1.60 chevy valves undercut at the head [waiting on flow #'s I expect 265-275cfm int & 190cfm +/- exh
Engle solid cam .573 lift 252*@.050 282*adv 110cl
Roller rockers 1.5
m 1 or ld340 intake with holley 830cfm annular carb
1 3/4 hooker headers and 2 1/2 pipes [future upgrade to 3']
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2009, 01:42 PM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

Definitely more than your 235 60 14's will be able to hook up with... ;-D
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2009, 01:57 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

Yeah those are gonna have to come off for some MT's, ah hemm.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:14 PM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

Get some 5X4.5 pattern axles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:15 PM
Century Cp Guru Century Cp Guru is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: usa.usa
Posts: 191
Default

I had A Desk top Dyno ill Have too llok for it, itwas REal accurate Too.Gotta clean this desk off.And Enough Hp to Get Ya in Trouble With CHIPS or your Local County Sheriff.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:20 PM
crisser crisser is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lafayette,la
Posts: 521
Default

470-480 HP @ around 6200
450-470# @ around 4200.

Might make around 500 hp with 10.5 to 11:0 compress.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:27 PM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

Use the M1 intake. The additional cubes + lower gears & 4spd in a light car should have ample torque without the dual plane intake. Let 'er breathe!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:36 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

Keep in mind the 408 that blueprint sells [stock magnums,9.5,dual plane, and small flat tappet cam dynos @ 375hp 480ftlbs
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:45 PM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

I think that they intentionally set it up that way for a wider selection of applications, i.e., heavy car, high rear gear ratios, automatics & less maintenance (hyd. cam). I'm sure that crate engine has alot more potential with a single plane, larger hyd or solid cam. I'm still not sure why some people insist that the Magnum head is the one to use to make power with factory iron castings, though. Even if they were capable of producing a few more ponies than the early pre-Magnum casting, I'd still use the early head so I wouldn't have to be concerned about them cracking - like the Magnums are well known for...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-02-2009, 02:51 PM
TeamDart TeamDart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lakeside/CA
Posts: 62
Default

With those heads, the single plain won't benefit you much in the horsepower department over a good dual plane, but it will lose a considerable amount of torque...

Running 580hp with a dual plane here.... but also have other wild small blocks that "need" a single plane, the dual planes of today are just so diverse it's hard to not pick one for a street car
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-02-2009, 03:16 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

magnums ported only end up in the 250's by the best maybe 270cfm with lots of work/mods.
With that said I don't think the blueprint would have much more potential then 430hp no matter what cam.

I just with I had 11.1 and a roller.lol
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-02-2009, 03:20 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

I use a single plane on a 344ci, it's definitely not a cork in the system which was my concern with the dual plane I have, though I would rather the dual plane for the more usable low/mid torque if it still fit, but then again if I put the cam straight up again and turn over 7000rpm then the single is the choice.

I'm probably making in the neighborhood of 450hp with the 344 10.5 .528 284* 240's/185 cfm in the heads now.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-02-2009, 03:40 PM
TeamDart TeamDart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lakeside/CA
Posts: 62
Default

You don't want to turn over 7000rpm with a 4"crank, and those heads. For a street car stick with a "Realistic" rpm. With that crank you're slinging alot of weight around, and every 100rpm's just becomes that much more weight.... grams turns to pounds.....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-02-2009, 04:02 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

I plan on about 6200-6500 with the 410ci.
The 344 used to turn 7200 w/ported x heads and making good power no problems then I put 4 1/2* advance into the cam and only rev 65-6700rpm.

car has 25' tire and a 3.73
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-02-2009, 04:03 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Thumbs up

If anyone has a deck top dyno they could run the #'s through for fun i'd be stoked.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-02-2009, 04:12 PM
TeamDart TeamDart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lakeside/CA
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by passing you View Post
I plan on about 6200-6500 with the 410ci.
The 344 used to turn 7200 w/ported x heads and making good power no problems then I put 4 1/2* advance into the cam and only rev 65-6700rpm.

car has 25' tire and a 3.73
A 340 is going to make a completely different power band than a 410. My 360 stock bore/stroke makes 520hp at 7300rpm.... yet my 419 makes 580hp at 5900 rpm.... on purpose, because my 419 was to be a street car, and my 360 is in a Bracket car. What rods do you plan on using?

And on your 344 what did you degree the cam out for as far as LCA goes?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-02-2009, 06:03 PM
TK TK is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not here anymore
Posts: 8,876
Default

About 410HP and TQ around 5300.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-02-2009, 08:37 PM
Century Cp Guru Century Cp Guru is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: usa.usa
Posts: 191
Default

My Kids 340 with A Wieand Stealth works real ,good its pretty hard To beat a LD 340 i bet the M 1 dont beat it By 10 Hp on the dyno if that much.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-02-2009, 08:54 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamDart View Post
A 340 is going to make a completely different power band than a 410. My 360 stock bore/stroke makes 520hp at 7300rpm.... yet my 419 makes 580hp at 5900 rpm.... on purpose, because my 419 was to be a street car, and my 360 is in a Bracket car. What rods do you plan on using?

And on your 344 what did you degree the cam out for as far as LSA goes?
In the stroker is a 'ohio crank kit' that came with 6.123 h beam rods, don't know who exactly made them but thats what I'm using.

The 344 has a .528 solid 112cl 284* 241*.050 60* overlap and was installed 110cl then lastly at 107.5cl

So it's at 107.5cl and uses a old 70's single plane weiand and 750holley dp.
The 344 runs real good and is no slouch.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-02-2009, 08:57 PM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TK View Post
About 410HP and TQ around 5300.
If it makes that lil it's cause it's only running on 6 cylinders.lol
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:01 AM
pcrmike's Avatar
pcrmike pcrmike is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lawrenceburg, TN
Age: 48
Posts: 2,215
Default

The stock maggies, yeah, but the new Iron Ram heads for the Magnum is a great piece. 300CFM is not too hard with smart work on those. :-) PCRMike
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:27 AM
TeamDart TeamDart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lakeside/CA
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrmike View Post
The stock maggies, yeah, but the new Iron Ram heads for the Magnum is a great piece. 300CFM is not too hard with smart work on those. :-) PCRMike
300cfm on Magnum heads? Is this on a magical flow bench or a real flow bench j/k
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:30 AM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

No doubt that the LD340 intake is a great intake that was ahead of its time, and probably just as good output-wise as the newer RPM intake. But I think that the M1 single plane will have an edge over the dual plane in HP in the upper rpm range, especially when the HP goal is around 500. I really don't think that the single plane M1 will lose that much streetable torque over the LD340 in this application.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:32 AM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrmike View Post
The stock maggies, yeah, but the new Iron Ram heads for the Magnum is a great piece. 300CFM is not too hard with smart work on those. :-) PCRMike
yeah those heads are bad assington for the buck, thet are around 250-60cfm out of the box.
stock magnums suck, j's destroy those things.
The RT's great as well, just wish they would cast them for shaft mount......
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:34 AM
pcrmike's Avatar
pcrmike pcrmike is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lawrenceburg, TN
Age: 48
Posts: 2,215
Default

They are a clean sheet revamp (contradiction? Maybe) of the design of the Magnum heads with meatier port walls and deck, as well as beefier area between the valves, prone to "wrinkling" or puckering under heavy use and HP loads. Fair bit larger ports too. I am drooling over a set now, but have to CAD the ports before I start. Not mine, but will report back when I get his heads done. The original article I heard of these with said that untouched they were good for 260+ on the intake side if I recall correctly, able to outflow even many aftermarket blowtie heads. I have not tested to see, but from others and the info I have, I think a good, solid 300+ is going to be had. Exhaust looks promising too. We'll see. :-)PCRMike
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:50 AM
passing you passing you is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 731
Default

good deal.

300+ is W series territory.
The iron rams are pretty different port wise from the magnums, which is a good thing. lol
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-03-2009, 01:08 AM
pcrmike's Avatar
pcrmike pcrmike is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lawrenceburg, TN
Age: 48
Posts: 2,215
Default

Yup, but keep the dual quench chamber. The port setup is comparable, but a lot better. They should prove durable and HD. They can take I think it said .040 off the deck with no probs. Try THAT with a magnum. :-) PCRMike
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:11 PM
valiant64 valiant64 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgecrest,Ca.
Posts: 885
Default

Yay! If you get Magnum-style heads you can switch to Shoverolet stud mount crap! lol jk
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-03-2009, 04:42 PM
TK TK is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not here anymore
Posts: 8,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by passing you View Post
If it makes that lil it's cause it's only running on 6 cylinders.lol

You sure? J heads, stroker, thats a pretty good number at 5300rpm. What it does before or after that, is you decision. I don't think your HP numbers are going to be as high as you think, but the TQ numbers will be in the 1.2-1.5 LBS per Inch range.

I have a 390 and I doubt it makes 400HP. Hogged 302 heads, 9-1, voodoo 268/276 cam, streetmaster motor.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-03-2009, 06:13 PM
pcrmike's Avatar
pcrmike pcrmike is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lawrenceburg, TN
Age: 48
Posts: 2,215
Default

Magnum style head on the Iron Ram doesn't have the dogleg in the exhaust to compete with. The J is a great head, but it still has the dogleg. I have a set right now. My first set of "J"s. I am digging in them right now. I prefer them over the Magnums, frankly, as far as port goes, but definitely not chamber. I have found also, as a side note, that a polish of the chamber takes MOST of the risk of pucker away from the Magnums, but not all. You have to use other quench tricks on a J, like special "D" domes to create a similar effect. :-)PCRMike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
440 HP & Torque Guesstimates valiant64 Performance Talk 42 03-11-2009 11:21 PM
B1 416 stroker.... B1owner Performance Talk 18 08-08-2005 07:33 PM
Hypothetical torque difference from 383 ci to 412 ci stroker Fast One Performance Talk 1 08-28-2002 12:34 PM
Eagle 'RB' 4.15 Stroker Crank VS. MP 4.15 Stroker Crank VS. Welded Stock Steel krownman Performance Talk 5 03-04-2001 11:47 PM
1/4 mile guesstimates rb77413 Performance Talk 8 12-16-2000 02:41 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .