Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2009, 01:47 PM
moparracer54 moparracer54 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: nebraska
Posts: 81
Default proform rockers

Are these things worth a crap?? The price is right but if they're junk I would like to know.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2009, 05:02 PM
70AARCuda 70AARCuda is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: las vegas nv
Age: 70
Posts: 522
Default

never have used the proform rockers..

but have used a set of the aluminum roller rockers from procomp on a 340 bracket motor for 2 yrs...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:29 PM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

Who makes MP, Crane? I got a set of MP 1.6:1 B rockers and they are blue like proform, working fine so far. I dont think "offshore" should be a deal breaker. Even Carillo rods have failed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2009, 02:03 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

Depends of the usage. For mild cams, they should be ok, but for serious spring pressures, use something else. The biggest differencies are in materials and manufacturing process and you should ask the manufacturer about the limits. If he can't tell, don't use them. Aluminum is fatigue, it work hardens and craks with enough stress cycles, extruded material is weaker than billet. If steel rockers were made for the 440-1 heads we have, that's what we would use. And that's what I would definitely use in any dual purpose engines that have them available.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2009, 02:14 AM
toad490's Avatar
toad490 toad490 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vernon British Columbia
Age: 70
Posts: 1,148
Default

To a certan extent the old saying ''you get what you pay for'' is true but that said I think it depends on what your setup is. What would be perfectly good for a hyd cam might not work for a solid roller with high spring pressure.

Pishta, I believe at one time Dove made MP rockers, I'm not sure if that's still true or not.

Dart posted while I was doing mine and he says it alot better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2009, 02:51 AM
MerrittRacing MerrittRacing is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DeSoto, Mo
Age: 41
Posts: 83
Default

I had a friend that ran a brand new set of these on a 340 in a dirt car. He was running a Hughes solid cam with about 335-340lbs open.. They lasted for about 12 nights and then started breaking... They would break right in the center of the shaft part of the rocker. The bottom half would stay held down by the rocker shaft and the top would just be flopping around everywhere making all kinds of noise. I have put a few sets on other peoples engines that were hyd camshaft engines and they are still working fine.. I think Proform says a max of 350lbs but I wouldn't put much more than 330 or so on them. Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2009, 08:19 AM
moparracer54 moparracer54 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: nebraska
Posts: 81
Default

Thats all that i needed to hear to shy away from these.......it just sucks knowing a guy has to dish out $400-$500 to get a decent set of rockers. So what brand should a guy go with?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2009, 11:40 AM
340_GTS 340_GTS is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Torrington, CT
Posts: 687
Default

Comp Cams makes real nice chromemoly steel roller rockers. After much research, that's what I decided on when I built my 340. No problems ever. Rockers, shafts, and spacers are under $450 for small blocks. Big block sets are around $500.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2009, 06:12 PM
fat 360 fat 360 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: bundaberg qld
Posts: 93
Default

I remember reading somewhere that(summit/jegs/something like that) proform rockers where only rated to '480 tho lift.yuck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2009, 08:16 PM
mopar29mod mopar29mod is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 606
Default

I have had the Crane gold rockers on my 318 for years with 508 cam, and the modified has 550 cam with some sealed power alum rockers, so far no issues
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:19 AM
MerrittRacing MerrittRacing is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DeSoto, Mo
Age: 41
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moparracer54 View Post
Thats all that i needed to hear to shy away from these.......it just sucks knowing a guy has to dish out $400-$500 to get a decent set of rockers. So what brand should a guy go with?
The best bang for the buck I he came across is the Crane Gold rockers.. they are really good and will work with alot of spring pressure flawless... I have a set that has been on a big block for 5 years with around 660lbs of open pressure and haven't had a problem with them..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-18-2009, 11:14 PM
djswwg djswwg is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: in my garage
Posts: 1,401
i agree totally with MerrittRacing-best bang for the buck is still the Crane Golds, very durable and not too pricey.............djs
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-18-2009, 11:24 PM
70AARCuda 70AARCuda is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: las vegas nv
Age: 70
Posts: 522
Default

hope you have a source for crane gold shalft mounted rockers for mopars...

cause crane went out of business about a year ago...

they are not listed with summit and jegs dont list them anymore...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-19-2009, 02:37 AM
cageman's Avatar
cageman cageman is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bismarck ND
Age: 46
Posts: 5,544
Default

they are back in business again.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-19-2009, 08:52 PM
70AARCuda 70AARCuda is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: las vegas nv
Age: 70
Posts: 522
Default

ok..but i checked jegs and summit...and nothing is in stock...not even listed

where can they be bought?


found this...not quite in business yet....and i am sure making rocker arms for mopars is one of the first thing they will do...>LOL>>>>LOL

http://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/...page=0&gonew=1
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-19-2009, 10:39 PM
340_GTS 340_GTS is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Torrington, CT
Posts: 687
Default

What is wrong with the steel ones Comp Cams sells?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:31 PM
djswwg djswwg is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: in my garage
Posts: 1,401
Thumbs up

there's really nothing wrong with the Comp rockers, (i've used them) but they cost more and are heavier than the Crane Golds. i called Crane about 2 weeks ago and was told that they are back in business. they are concentrating on getting the cams/lifters available first, then everything else in the catalog will eventually become available again. i'll bet that if your usual supplier ordered a set of the Golds you'd probably get them or at least an estimated delivery date..........djs
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:14 AM
340_GTS 340_GTS is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Torrington, CT
Posts: 687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djswwg View Post
there's really nothing wrong with the Comp rockers, (i've used them) but they cost more and are heavier than the Crane Golds. ..........djs
I'm not arguing here, but look at this from Comp Cams about the weight issue:
Lose the weight, keep the strength.
COMP Cams Pro Magnum shaft mount roller rocker arms combine the strength of 8650 chromemoly steel and the weight savings of aluminum rockers. COMP Cams took advantage of computer design to simulate the stresses that affect rockers under various operating loads. This allowed the engineers to lessen the rockers' mass at non-critical areas, and strengthen the areas that take the most punishment. The results are rocker arms that are strong where they need to be, and actually weigh 5 percent less at the valve than comparable aluminum rockers.


FYI, as to pricing, the big block Comp Cams steel rocker set with shafts is $500 from Summit.

Cranes for the big block are priced individually, 16 X $36.39 = $582 for just the rockers. (Summit prices).
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:32 AM
cageman's Avatar
cageman cageman is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bismarck ND
Age: 46
Posts: 5,544
Default

I dont know if they make the pro magnums for a dodge yet, or am I thinking of onother magnum style, I have been waiting for them to come out, as alum rockers dont hold up at all to circle track use.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-20-2009, 01:29 PM
340_GTS 340_GTS is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Torrington, CT
Posts: 687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cageman View Post
I dont know if they make the pro magnums for a dodge yet, or am I thinking of onother magnum style, I have been waiting for them to come out, as alum rockers dont hold up at all to circle track use.
I have them on my 340. #1322-16. Part number for big blocks is #1321-16. Both show as being in stock at Summit.

Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:37 PM
djswwg djswwg is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: in my garage
Posts: 1,401
as for pricing, here is Cdn.$ -Comp. #1321-16 $630.93
-Crane #64790-1 $493.99
both are complete sets. as for the weight issue, Comp does not say specifically who's rockers theirs are lighter than, and (read it carefully) it's on the valve end, by 5%. the overall weight, which is what your valve train lives with, may be more. at any rate, we're probably splitting hairs here. both (in my opinion) are quite good quality. over a long time period, the aluminum ones may eventually work harden and crack, but i haven't seen it yet. just my experience.....djs
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-21-2009, 01:34 AM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

I may have a line on some SB crane golds, hit me up in a PM. I also got a set of 273 forged mechs.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-22-2009, 10:36 AM
JCFcuda JCFcuda is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: plattsburgh ny
Posts: 147
Default

Those Cranes are,a great rocker for the money. They will be tested if you start to run lift's bigger that 700 and spring pressure over 650.
I have been running mine for 6 years (drag only) 680 lift no problems.
A friend was using them and steped up 705 lift. and started breaking one every couple of weeks. They would just peal of the shaft cracking on the bottom.
Those comps dont like those preesures eather. An other racer i know used them on his SB and he was replacing one of them often. Very high rpms on that motor.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-22-2009, 09:15 PM
DJM DJM is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: VC, ND
Posts: 258
Default

As for roller tips i have seen them spit out the rollers though and it not a nice thing. I will stilck to the doctile iron non roller.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proform Heads??????? 66cornet Performance Talk 11 05-18-2010 12:00 AM
proform roller rockers? darkside Performance Talk 10 11-11-2006 05:02 PM
Proform roller tip rockers? TK Performance Talk 21 08-15-2006 11:11 AM
proform brand roller rockers docmopar440 Performance Talk 4 12-21-2004 11:37 PM
Proform RRs? mastrdrver Performance Talk 6 11-03-2003 10:22 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .