Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2010, 03:32 PM
dakman1 dakman1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: eastpointe mi
Age: 59
Posts: 144
Default 360 Crate motor vacuum ?

On a 380hp 360. Manifold vacuum at idle is about 9lbs. This seems kinda low.
I was thinking more like 12. Any opinions welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2010, 04:46 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakman1 View Post
On a 380hp 360. Manifold vacuum at idle is about 9lbs. This seems kinda low.
I was thinking more like 12. Any opinions welcome.
auto tranny? is reading while in gear and stopped?
what is idle rpm?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2010, 05:04 PM
dakman1 dakman1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: eastpointe mi
Age: 59
Posts: 144
Default

Reading is in neutral. In gear at 700rpm reading is about 7lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2010, 05:05 PM
dakman1 dakman1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: eastpointe mi
Age: 59
Posts: 144
Default

Auto trans.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2010, 05:37 PM
chirorod chirorod is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florence, MA
Age: 84
Posts: 724
Default

how are you checking vacuum? should read in mmHg. If you're using a combination fuel pressure/vacuum gauge, the needle is dual function. you may be noting the pressure scale. if so, read the other end of the needle on the other scale.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2010, 06:00 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

I'd up your idle.
Vacuum seems low. In gear, stopped, my 496 is at 10 inches, and it has a solid roller 254/258 @.050 with .625 lift.

I would suspect your reading is not accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2010, 09:45 PM
rampage_82 rampage_82 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountainair NM
Posts: 657
Default

when Mopar Muscle did their test on the 380 crate, they reported 6.5" to 7" of vaccum at 850rpm... Here is the article... http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/t...dup/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-28-2010, 03:11 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage_82 View Post
when Mopar Muscle did their test on the 380 crate, they reported 6.5" to 7" of vaccum at 850rpm... Here is the article... http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/t...dup/index.html
kiss your power brakes goodbye!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-28-2010, 06:53 AM
rampage_82 rampage_82 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountainair NM
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
I'd up your idle.
Vacuum seems low. In gear, stopped, my 496 is at 10 inches, and it has a solid roller 254/258 @.050 with .625 lift.
Yeah that is the funny thing about vacuum though, cubic inches and or stroke has a huge effect on vacuum readings. first take your combo for instance, beings that it is a mechanical roller then you can take what the Hyd equivalent would be which would be around 244/248 @ .050". Then factor in the stroker kit, and some small port aluminum heads (I'm guessing Indy SR's). It stands to reason why you get good vacuum. Take this into consideration. I had fully ported 906 heads and a Lunati Bracket master II cam in a 440. That combo would pull 15" @1,000 rpm easily. I put those parts on a 383, it only pulls 8 to 9" @ 1,000 rpm and that is pulling every trick I can think of to get it higher.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-28-2010, 03:10 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage_82 View Post
Yeah that is the funny thing about vacuum though, cubic inches and or stroke has a huge effect on vacuum readings. first take your combo for instance, beings that it is a mechanical roller then you can take what the Hyd equivalent would be which would be around 244/248 @ .050". Then factor in the stroker kit, and some small port aluminum heads (I'm guessing Indy SR's). It stands to reason why you get good vacuum. Take this into consideration. I had fully ported 906 heads and a Lunati Bracket master II cam in a 440. That combo would pull 15" @1,000 rpm easily. I put those parts on a 383, it only pulls 8 to 9" @ 1,000 rpm and that is pulling every trick I can think of to get it higher.
I guess it makes sense, in that big blocks are always known to be able to handle longer duration cams (have a more decent idle), than small blocks. Must be due to the
cylinder not bleeding off as much pressure due to having a larger volume.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-28-2010, 06:36 PM
dgc333 dgc333 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembroke, MA
Posts: 773
Default

What's your initial timing? With that cam you should be up around 20. Adjust the initial timing for peak manifold vacuum.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:20 PM
dakman1 dakman1 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: eastpointe mi
Age: 59
Posts: 144
Default

Thanks rampage 82, I feel better after reading that article.
dgc 333 I did use vacuum gage to set timing. Engine response is crisp but I don't have a dial back timing light to say for sure where initial is at.
Thanks to all for your feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-29-2010, 01:37 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgc333 View Post
What's your initial timing? With that cam you should be up around 20. Adjust the initial timing for peak manifold vacuum.
may not crank over at startup with an initial timing of 20. May need some kinda timing retard. I solved that by having a switch in the power lead to my MS6 Box. I get the motor cranking then cut in the ignition, and pop, she starts right up. Saves wear and tear on your starter and electrical system, and you don't have to pay for timing retard. Its also a great theft deterent, as they don't know about the switch.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-29-2010, 07:28 AM
rampage_82 rampage_82 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountainair NM
Posts: 657
Default

Haha funny story... my buddy had a 13.5.1 BBC, and he decided he wanted to lock out his timing. I kept on telling him that he needed to get a timing retard for starting, and he didn't listen, and decided on the flipping the switch trick. Anyways he set it at 28 degrees to be safe, and the first time he tried to crank er up, kerblamo his brand new MSD starter broke in half... So there he was on the phone ordering a new starter and retard box... All he said after he hung up was.... "Shut the F up Guy"
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-29-2010, 06:09 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage_82 View Post
Haha funny story... my buddy had a 13.5.1 BBC, and he decided he wanted to lock out his timing. I kept on telling him that he needed to get a timing retard for starting, and he didn't listen, and decided on the flipping the switch trick. Anyways he set it at 28 degrees to be safe, and the first time he tried to crank er up, kerblamo his brand new MSD starter broke in half... So there he was on the phone ordering a new starter and retard box... All he said after he hung up was.... "Shut the F up Guy"
28 degrees BTDC seems extreme, and I would think that may have caused the starter failure.
I think my initial timing is about 17 degrees BTDC. My system of flipping on the MSD box after hitting the starter has worked fine for the last 8 years. If I have the MSD box on while hitting the starter, the engine can be harder to start, especially when it is warmed up, and due to my battery being in the trunk (which causes a larger current draw at startup).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-29-2010, 06:35 PM
rampage_82 rampage_82 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountainair NM
Posts: 657
Default

I think you missed the part of my story about the "locked out" timing
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-30-2010, 07:57 PM
dgc333 dgc333 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembroke, MA
Posts: 773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
may not crank over at startup with an initial timing of 20. May need some kinda timing retard. I solved that by having a switch in the power lead to my MS6 Box. I get the motor cranking then cut in the ignition, and pop, she starts right up. Saves wear and tear on your starter and electrical system, and you don't have to pay for timing retard. Its also a great theft deterent, as they don't know about the switch.
I am running my 10.6:1 360 (190-200 psi cranking pressure) at 18 and have had it as high as 22 and the starter spins it over just as easily as it does at 12.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-01-2010, 02:52 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgc333 View Post
I am running my 10.6:1 360 (190-200 psi cranking pressure) at 18 and have had it as high as 22 and the starter spins it over just as easily as it does at 12.
Are you saying that more initial timing does not make it harder on the starter, or the electrical system, to start a motor?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-02-2010, 12:44 AM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
28 degrees BTDC seems extreme, and I would think that may have caused the starter failure.
I think my initial timing is about 17 degrees BTDC. My system of flipping on the MSD box after hitting the starter has worked fine for the last 8 years. If I have the MSD box on while hitting the starter, the engine can be harder to start, especially when it is warmed up, and due to my battery being in the trunk (which causes a larger current draw at startup).
Ditto, friend turned me onto that years ago too. Never tried it, never had to but I heard him do it. Pretty cool. ditty-ditty-ditty-diity-vwoom! like clockwork. says it saves wear as the free spinning no load RPM's are enough to start the oil pressure before starting. He looks at the oil pressure guage and as soon as it registers he lights it off. Some how Wire an oil pressure idiot light sender to the white wire or relay that kicks the MSD on when oil pressure builds..?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-02-2010, 04:18 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pishta View Post
Ditto, friend turned me onto that years ago too. Never tried it, never had to but I heard him do it. Pretty cool. ditty-ditty-ditty-diity-vwoom! like clockwork. says it saves wear as the free spinning no load RPM's are enough to start the oil pressure before starting. He looks at the oil pressure guage and as soon as it registers he lights it off. Some how Wire an oil pressure idiot light sender to the white wire or relay that kicks the MSD on when oil pressure builds..?
Ya, a $5 switch is better than a $100 timing retard module!

I didn't think about the oil pressue coming up quicker too! Thats another plus!!

I'm all for the engine lasting longer. Getting too old for engine rebuilds!!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-14-2010, 07:29 PM
dgc333 dgc333 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembroke, MA
Posts: 773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Are you saying that more initial timing does not make it harder on the starter, or the electrical system, to start a motor?
On my engine there is no noticeable difference in the way the engine turns over between 12 BTDC and 18 BTDC or even 22 BTDC. I am quite sure it puts more load on the starter and battery but the engine does not kick back against the starter and the engine starts instantly cold or hot.

The starter is a parts store rebuilt mini starter and has been on the engine for just shy of 36,000 miles (5 years).
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-17-2010, 08:57 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgc333 View Post
On my engine there is no noticeable difference in the way the engine turns over between 12 BTDC and 18 BTDC or even 22 BTDC. I am quite sure it puts more load on the starter and battery but the engine does not kick back against the starter and the engine starts instantly cold or hot.

The starter is a parts store rebuilt mini starter and has been on the engine for just shy of 36,000 miles (5 years).
No doubt it will work, but may shorten the life of some components. How much? Who knows? Also, the fact that oil pressure starts building earlier with no load on engine is a big plus.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-18-2010, 09:40 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgc333 View Post
On my engine there is no noticeable difference in the way the engine turns over between 12 BTDC and 18 BTDC or even 22 BTDC. I am quite sure it puts more load on the starter and battery but the engine does not kick back against the starter and the engine starts instantly cold or hot.

The starter is a parts store rebuilt mini starter and has been on the engine for just shy of 36,000 miles (5 years).

The real bummer, is when you have a lot of advance in at starting, and your battery is a little weak, and you just fill up at the gas station, and then the car won't turn over. I've been stuck there once because of that. Had to turn the distriutor to remove some of the advance so it would start.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-18-2010, 12:57 PM
RacerHog RacerHog is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monrovia.Calif.
Age: 60
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakman1 View Post
On a 380hp 360. Manifold vacuum at idle is about 9lbs. This seems kinda low.
I was thinking more like 12. Any opinions welcome.
Sounds like its got the large chamber iron smog heads on it with a 300 Duration (Purple)cam in it...???

And it pings its azz off....Dont it?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-19-2010, 07:20 PM
dgc333 dgc333 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembroke, MA
Posts: 773
Default

I can't see the sense in compromising timing which impacts how the engine runs all the time because it might shorten the life of the starter or if you have a weak battery it might not start.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-20-2010, 05:23 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgc333 View Post
I can't see the sense in compromising timing which impacts how the engine runs all the time because it might shorten the life of the starter or if you have a weak battery it might not start.
I agree! I try not to compromise performance for anything. But it makes sense to me to initially spin the engine with the ignition off, which takes stress off the battery (especially if its in the trunk) and starter, and helps build oil pressure quicker (most all engine wear occurs at startup), then flip a switch to cut in the ignition. Like was mentioned, a $5 switch, which is also a great theft deterent. May be the best $5 ever spent!

Also, before the engine ignites, you are drawing in more gas fumes to make the start easier as well. On my single plane, when its cold out, that helps quite a bit.

If an engine fires immediately, then it is under load with oil not present in all areas, like the valve train!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
crate motor in 97 ram 4x4 1 ram Jeep Chat (Wrangler, Cherokee, etc...) 23 06-12-2006 03:47 PM
rebuilt motor/ crate motor 69coronet318 Performance Talk 1 02-17-2003 11:38 AM
395 hp 360 crate motor guy Circle Track Chat 5 04-04-2002 01:48 AM
wiring from the 4x4 vacuum motor to the dash indicator NealE Ram Truck Chat 1 01-11-2002 04:00 PM
MP 360 300 crate motor? 440forPOWER Performance Talk 0 03-26-2001 12:12 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .