Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2010, 10:53 AM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default Torque

I have a 1965 Chrysler Windsor with a 361/727/ 8 3/4

It has the stock pistons, 383 magnum cam, points ignition,Mallory Hyfire 1 igntion, Crane PS-91 coil, M-1 dual plane intake with cross over still functioning, 600 holley, 452 heads, log manifolds, dual exhaust with dynomax super turbo mufflers, stock torque converter

with 2.76 gears I have run 16.49 @86.

My question is.. what is the best way to make more torque?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2010, 04:36 PM
peg leg peg leg is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Star, Idaho
Age: 88
Posts: 2,669
Default Torque

Talking developing here, electronic ignition from Mopar and TTI headers. Getting the torque to work means axle ratio. That ratio is the torque multiplier. You need more in the 3.55 to 4.11 region. Street use and highway use dictate less than 4.11. Your car is heavy, and all the ratio in the world is not going to make it a 13 second car without serious engine work. A 3.55 would be fun and streetable, and probably in the low 15's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2010, 06:06 PM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

TTI headers are not in the budget... but I am thinking about Headman Shorties Headers as I heard they fit well in a C...

I'm not looking to make it a drag car.. just more usable torque ..

The 3.55's are in the works for next year with a Detroit Locker..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2010, 06:40 PM
nhdriver's Avatar
nhdriver nhdriver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rochester,NH
Posts: 1,924
Default

The 3:55's will make a world of difference. Why spend all that $$ for a locker? A mopar sure grip or an Auburn Diff. would surely be less expensive. A locker isn't needed in your street car, the locker is overkill.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2010, 07:44 PM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

True... I ran 12's on a sure-grip at 4000 lbs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2010, 06:32 PM
Paul Precht Paul Precht is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pa
Age: 69
Posts: 173
Default

If you put unmilled 452 heads on a stock 361 with a Felpro style gasket, your comp ratio is about 7.5, you're loosing a lot of torque that way. A 3.55 gear would make a huge difference. Try milling the heads about .020" and using a steel shim gasket, that will raise a full point or so.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2010, 06:35 PM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

I could always put the big exhaust valve in the 516's and throw them back on..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2010, 11:42 PM
ehostler's Avatar
ehostler ehostler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Annandale, VA
Age: 57
Posts: 15,212
Default

If you go with the larger exhaust valves, make sure you get the hardened seats installed. That will protect you against the unleaded gas.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2011, 09:47 AM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

The more I think of it.. I shouldn't need the big exhaust valve.. it is only 361 CI..

The plans so far are a 1 Inch spacer, H-pipe and HP manifolds.. if I can find gears in my price range I will put them in.. otherwise the 2.76 will have to stay for now..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:08 PM
John Kunkel John Kunkel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NorCal
Age: 80
Posts: 10,059
Default

You basically negated all the other mods when you put the 452 heads on it and the 2.76 gears will kill performance no matter what else you do.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:49 PM
Ray Bell's Avatar
Ray Bell Ray Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dalveen, Queensland
Posts: 3,236
Default

From experiences that have been related to me, a good man tinkering over your engine on a chassis dyno will make a significant difference.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-26-2011, 06:13 PM
rampage_82 rampage_82 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountainair NM
Posts: 657
Default

If you can get a set of long tube headers will also make a big difference... Manifolds of any type kill performance...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-26-2011, 11:52 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

A good 2500 to 3500 stall converter will double the torque to the
rear wheels!

Next best way: More displacement!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2011, 12:32 AM
Rich Kinsley Rich Kinsley is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Omaha/Ne
Age: 80
Posts: 760
Default

[QUOTE=bbaspense;815804]The more I think of it.. I shouldn't need the big exhaust valve.. it is only 361 CI..

The plans so far are a 1 Inch spacer,

================================================== =========

The spacers work really well for me. My situation is different though but I still think you will gain from the spacers. I had Swirl Torque spacers but I found the aluminum to be a detriment in that even with gaskets my carbs were running 180deg in the bowls. My older style manifold didn't have phenolic or wood spacers available so I built my own. After the installation my carbs run 110deg at the bowls. That's a very significant change!

I used 3 pieces of 1/2" MDX plywood with the paper backing sanded off. Then we glued the 3 pieces together with glue a friend recommended. Then I bored the venturi to match the swirl torque and coated the venturi area with POR15. The main body I sprayed with Dupli-color clear high heat engine enamel.

They have been on about 3 years now and I did remove them for inspection. They look like new still. Kinda tedious but satisfying!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 60940135.jpg (71.6 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg 60940139.jpg (42.5 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg 60940127.jpg (96.0 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg 60940106.jpg (115.6 KB, 6 views)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:59 AM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

COOL.. thanks for the advice.

I am thinking of running with the heat cross over blocked.. won't that reduce the temperature going into the aluminum spacer?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2011, 10:19 AM
mtdrydock mtdrydock is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MT
Posts: 61
Default

look into Richmond Gear Powertrax. A buddy of mine swears by them. They apparently give more traction than Limited Slip without being full locker or spooled.

Check them out on the web, the videos they have will make you a believer too.

richmondgear.com/powertrax/noslip.html
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-27-2011, 10:45 AM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

I will check into that.. thanks
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-27-2011, 06:25 PM
crisser crisser is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lafayette,la
Posts: 521
Default

The only way to make more torque while keeping the gears, stall and CID the same is to get the cyls. to fill faster/more at low rpm.
The way I see it is to do it with cam and intake manifold. One would run a small runner intake with a new fast ramp cam.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:08 PM
Rich Kinsley Rich Kinsley is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Omaha/Ne
Age: 80
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbaspense View Post
COOL.. thanks for the advice.

I am thinking of running with the heat cross over blocked.. won't that reduce the temperature going into the aluminum spacer?
Yup. I sealed up my crossover too.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 60940149.jpg (115.6 KB, 10 views)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-27-2011, 11:26 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

best bang for buck!
Lowering air inlet temp by 50 degrees, gives about 7.5% power increase!
On a 400 hp engine, thats 30 hp!!
Thats why cold air intakes are so popular!

http://ramairbox.com/
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-29-2011, 01:08 PM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

Now if I run a cold air tube to the front of the car that should further reduce the temps in the carb and should help quite a bit over the hot air under the hood.

BTW.. anyone ever blocked off the heat crossover on a stock pan? What would be the best way to do that without having to buy the pan with the crossover already blocked?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-29-2011, 01:26 PM
adodgemann's Avatar
adodgemann adodgemann is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Standish, Mi
Age: 63
Posts: 312
Default

BTW.. anyone ever blocked off the heat crossover on a stock pan? What would be the best way to do that without having to buy the pan with the crossover already blocked?[/QUOTE]

I cut some pieces of sheet metal to fit the hole, about the same thickness as the intake gasket. Held it in place with a very thin bead of RTV...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-29-2011, 01:47 PM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

basically it is held in place between the valley pan and the intake to keep it from moving?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:19 PM
adodgemann's Avatar
adodgemann adodgemann is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Standish, Mi
Age: 63
Posts: 312
Default

yes, I use the steel valley pan/intake gasket only...no paper gasket
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-31-2011, 08:14 AM
bbaspense's Avatar
bbaspense bbaspense is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bothwell,ON,Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Kinsley View Post
Yup. I sealed up my crossover too.
What did you use to seal that up.. is that some sort of epoxy and Metal?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
v-10 prw &torque? Sixman Ram Truck Chat 5 04-14-2008 04:08 PM
more torque dmangrum Dakota Truck Forum 2 10-01-2002 04:29 PM
Cam HP and Torque Fred Performance Talk 3 12-22-2001 11:16 PM
Big Torque-Low RPM! Brian Mills Performance Talk 7 09-29-2001 08:22 PM
Lug Nut Torque riskearam Ram Truck Chat 15 09-17-2001 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .