Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2012, 01:57 AM
scatpackjimmy's Avatar
scatpackjimmy scatpackjimmy is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Stanwood Washington
Age: 52
Posts: 8
Default Compression Ratio Help?

I have a 72 30 over 360 it has ported J heads with 2.02 1.60 pistons are hyper sterling 405p heads have been milled .10 and Im running a thin head gasket I think .25 or .29 can't remember. Any rough guesses on cr? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2012, 03:33 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

The pistons should be around 0.11" beloiw the deck at TDC, and they have a dish of about 8cc. Assuming the heads were around 70 cc bfefire milling and around 67cc with the cut, you should have the CR at about 8.1-8.2:1. Oops, dou you really mean thath the heads were milled 0.10"? I thought they were milled .010". If they wre truely milled 0.1" then you should be around 10:1.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:05 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

how much better is it to have zero deck height, instead, for example, the .11" mentioned above?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2012, 07:03 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

Typically with open chamber heads it doesn't matter much. Either you should have a relaitvely tight quench, about .040", or a lot of room between the chamber and piston top = over 0.12".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2012, 09:33 AM
dirttrackracer dirttrackracer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boyd, TX USA
Age: 64
Posts: 869
Default

I have the same pistons in a stock un decked block they are .054" in the hole.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2012, 07:20 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

There are variations, I calculated it with the advertised compression height and assumed the block height was 9.60". 1.576"+ (3.58"/2) + 6.123" = 9.489". Like with anything considering these not so accurate 30+ year old products, the only way to know is to measure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2012, 04:58 PM
Cudadrag Cudadrag is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Age: 63
Posts: 819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DartGT66 View Post
Like with anything considering these not so accurate 30+ year old products, the only way to know is to measure.
This is very true. I was suprised after assembling my 1974 400 block. I was expecting about a 11.5:1 - 11.7:1 compression after purchasing rods, pistons and having the heads setup. After assembly the pistons were closer to zero deck than expected. I had the block squared with very little shaving needed. But really did not measure the deck height assuming it was near stock. Well someone in the past had to have shaved the block in their attempt for a build. (This would explain why the block squared up so easily) My comp measures about 12.7:1. (with a .027" head gasket that was also purchased before assembly) Being I was planning on using E-85 fuel this was no problem thus it was a pleasent surprise. However, I also got lucky that the block was not shaved too much. (The B1 heads are closed chamber thus if over zero deck I would have been screwed) So I guess what I'm saying, assume nothing!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2012, 09:04 PM
scatpackjimmy's Avatar
scatpackjimmy scatpackjimmy is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Stanwood Washington
Age: 52
Posts: 8
Default

Update I got new pistons. I now have kb 107's that are suppose to be 9.8 to 1 with 72 cc heads I am running the thin gasket I think .o29 or .025 can't remember ? The heads have been milled .010 also so Im thinking around 10.0 to 1 now? Should be better.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-09-2012, 09:07 PM
scatpackjimmy's Avatar
scatpackjimmy scatpackjimmy is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Stanwood Washington
Age: 52
Posts: 8
Default

By the way I have the pistons mentioned for sale already pressed onto the rods with hastings moly rings for 250.00 if anyone is interested give me a shout.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compression Ratio Chuck'64 Performance Talk 16 08-29-2002 06:05 AM
Compression Ratio bwlizard Performance Talk 6 03-22-2001 07:00 PM
compression ratio help Dusterwedge Performance Talk 1 03-05-2001 12:42 AM
compression ratio vs. compression BB 70gtx Performance Talk 3 10-11-2000 05:02 AM
compression ratio ? larry phillips Performance Talk 1 07-14-2000 10:43 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .