Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2012, 04:42 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default synthetic vs mineral oil

My rebuilt 340 with a flat tappet cam now has about 1500 miles on it now. I am currently using Valvoline VR-1 10W30 oil. I was wondering if I should now switch to a synthetic oil. What are the pros and cons? Never ran synthetic oil before.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2012, 05:47 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

I have a 600+ hp 496, that I have used 5w-30 Mobile 1 fully synthetic for 12 years. Engine runs cooler, lasts longer, and makes more power due to less friction. Its a no brainer! And it flows a lot quicker to give more protection at startups, which are the cause of 95% of engine wear! Again, no brainer! I also run synthetic tranny fluid and rearend fluid. All good for about 20 more rear-wheel horsepower!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2012, 08:42 PM
JVMopar's Avatar
JVMopar JVMopar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mellen, WI
Age: 43
Posts: 2,524
Default

I would suggest you read this article. http://www.hughesengines.com/TechArt...ineoils101.php

And if you still want to run synthetic oil with your flat tappet cam, make sure you check the ppm of zinc phosphate. You want a minimum of 1200ppm. There are some synthetics out there that claim to have 1200ppm but it's not off the shelf at walmart stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2012, 11:32 PM
aarracer aarracer is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 891
Default

My engine builder said NO to synthetics. But what would he know, he only has 4 National Championships, 8 Divisional Championships, and 42 Wally's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:11 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aarracer View Post
My engine builder said NO to synthetics. But what would he know, he only has 4 National Championships, 8 Divisional Championships, and 42 Wally's

Why does he say no?

All the participants in the Engine Masters building competition in Hot Rod or Popular Hotrodding use synthetics. Probably every high performance car built in the world, like Ferrari, use synthetics! I suspect all of NASCAR uses synthetics. Even Dodge requires the Viper to use synthetics. Can't imagine an 8000 rpm NASCAR engine running for 5 hours, and the engine builder not wanting synthetic motor oil in it! Synthetics give you more margin against failure.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2012, 07:15 AM
JVMopar's Avatar
JVMopar JVMopar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mellen, WI
Age: 43
Posts: 2,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Why does he say no?

All the participants in the Engine Masters building competition in Hot Rod or Popular Hotrodding use synthetics. Probably every high performance car built in the world, like Ferrari, use synthetics! I suspect all of NASCAR uses synthetics. Even Dodge requires the Viper to use synthetics. Can't imagine an 8000 rpm NASCAR engine running for 5 hours, and the engine builder not wanting synthetic motor oil in it! Synthetics give you more margin against failure.
Lifters. Go read that link I posted.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2012, 07:59 AM
340_GTS 340_GTS is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Torrington, CT
Posts: 687
Default

Anything with a flat tappet cam needs Zinc in the oil for lubrication. No modern motor oil made to be used in new cars has the zinc. It really does not matter if the oil is synthetic or dino, just make sure it has enough of the Zinc additive in it. Zinc phosphate. 1200ppm of zinc phosphate minimum. I'm bettng the synthetic stuff the NASCAR guys use has it, because they are forced by the rules to use flat tappets. With roller tappets, which come on 99% of the new cars, you don't need the zinc. And many people retro fit rollers to older engines, so they can get away without the zinc.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-26-2012, 10:57 AM
aarracer aarracer is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Why does he say no?

All the participants in the Engine Masters building competition in Hot Rod or Popular Hotrodding use synthetics. Probably every high performance car built in the world, like Ferrari, use synthetics! I suspect all of NASCAR uses synthetics. Even Dodge requires the Viper to use synthetics. Can't imagine an 8000 rpm NASCAR engine running for 5 hours, and the engine builder not wanting synthetic motor oil in it! Synthetics give you more margin against failure.
I would guess, it is better for looser/wider bearing clearances. But I don't ask much other than for the tuneup tips and dyno sheets.

quote (By Reed Grant Class Racer)

re: oil wedge

There is only 3 areas in a motor that you can utilize a wedge---rod bearings, main bearings, and cam bearings. Every place else is on a film. Proper use of the wedge will make it almost friction-less(most synthetics), but a film only lessens the load. This is why synthetics, in this instance, is less friction. The oil molecules are like marbles. Man made synthetics have all marbles the same size. Most mineral base oils have all different size marbles, therefore the crank runs on different size marbles and is point contact loaded (it only rides on the large marbles).

end quote (By Reed Granrt on class racer)

Joe Gibbs Racing formulates their own non synthetic and synthetic oils. I don't know which ones they run in their racecars. But I bet they sell a lot of both. I have used their breakin oil on my older engines. I would not even attempt to compare a Dry sump oiling system engine to a Wet sump oiling system engine as a defence for a particular oil type!

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:26 PM
John Kunkel John Kunkel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NorCal
Age: 80
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Engine runs cooler, lasts longer,
How do you know that? Advertising or actual field comparison of the same engine on both conventional and synthetic?


Quote:
And it flows a lot quicker to give more protection at startups, which are the cause of 95% of engine wear!
That's the subject of much debate; synthetic fluids do not stick to surfaces like conventional petroleum oil and run off in matter of hours, rather than days as is the case with petroleum oil. Therefore at cold start the surfaces are less protected and therefore MORE wear might occur at cold starts than it would with conventional petroleum oil especially in cars that sit for long periods and aren't driven regularly.

I'm a big fan of synthetics but recognize their shortcomings.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-26-2012, 09:21 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kunkel View Post
How do you know that? Advertising or actual field comparison of the same engine on both conventional and synthetic?




That's the subject of much debate; synthetic fluids do not stick to surfaces like conventional petroleum oil and run off in matter of hours, rather than days as is the case with petroleum oil. Therefore at cold start the surfaces are less protected and therefore MORE wear might occur at cold starts than it would with conventional petroleum oil especially in cars that sit for long periods and aren't driven regularly.

I'm a big fan of synthetics but recognize their shortcomings.
Synthetics not sticking, and not providing adequate protection at startup, is a myth, from what I've read. Do you have any documentation or proof?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-26-2012, 09:28 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JVMopar View Post
Lifters. Go read that link I posted.
I read it. Written in 2006. I conclude its saying "Ensure enough zinc additive if use any oil with high performance
flat tappet cams (synthetic or non synthetic oil)."


Found this on web:

AMSOIL Z-ROD Synthetic Motor Oil (ZRT, ZRF) features high-quality synthetic base stocks and a proprietary additive package tailored to perform on the street and protect during storage. AMSOIL Z-ROD Synthetic Motor Oil is formulated with high levels of ZDDP to protect flat-tappet cams, lifters, rockers and other areas susceptible to wear. Its high-zinc, high-phosphorus formulation provides the extra wear protection these critical splash-lubricated components require.

Also, "Royal Purple HPS is fortified with advanced additive technology - zinc/phosphorus anti-wear additives and Synerlec - to surpass many other oils."

Here's some zinc additives for sale:
http://www.nextag.com/zinc-oil-additive/shop-html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-27-2012, 05:21 PM
John Kunkel John Kunkel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NorCal
Age: 80
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Synthetics not sticking, and not providing adequate protection at startup, is a myth, from what I've read. Do you have any documentation or proof?
The first I became aware of this was when Mobile introduced their AV-1 full synthetic aviation oil. They withdrew it after a couple of years because certain engines with high-mounted camshafts (Lycoming) suffered premature cam/lifter failures that were attributed to oil draining from the cam surfaces during long periods of inactivity (common in GA aircraft). The conclusion was drawn both by the engine manufacturer and independent rebuild facilities.

This was the subject of several nasty lawsuits and lab tests verified the drainoff difference between synth and dino oils.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-27-2012, 05:33 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default

And I thought EVERYONE was going to tell me to switch to synthetic.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-27-2012, 06:59 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kunkel View Post
The first I became aware of this was when Mobile introduced their AV-1 full synthetic aviation oil. They withdrew it after a couple of years because certain engines with high-mounted camshafts (Lycoming) suffered premature cam/lifter failures that were attributed to oil draining from the cam surfaces during long periods of inactivity (common in GA aircraft). The conclusion was drawn both by the engine manufacturer and independent rebuild facilities.

This was the subject of several nasty lawsuits and lab tests verified the drainoff difference between synth and dino oils.
Interesting aviation issue, however, the subject, as of late, does not seem to be of much interest in the car/engine community, since 99% of the auto performance community seems to be ok with synthetics. Maybe all the more reason to use synthetics, since at startup they flow to the engine oiling areas much quicker than conventional oil. By the way, I have a Snapper lawnmower, and was told when I got it, use straight 30w conventional oil. Instead I went to 5w-30 synthetic, and just change the oil once a year. Be interesting to see how long it lasts. Had it for 17 years so far.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-27-2012, 07:04 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coupe32 View Post
And I thought EVERYONE was going to tell me to switch to synthetic.
Well, welcome to America. You've listened to the opinions, and you get to make your own free choice. At least Obama hasn't dictated whether we gotta use synthetic or not, YET!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-27-2012, 07:15 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default

Not yet anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-27-2012, 10:41 PM
Rich Kinsley Rich Kinsley is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Omaha/Ne
Age: 80
Posts: 760
Default

I just switched to Mobil One on the advice of my machinist/racer. He runs about .002" clearance and 2wt Mobil One in his 9800rpm 312ci Mopar racer.

I do add the zppd additive as I have a 318 poly w/solids. I am turning in the 7500rpm range now and it loves the synthetic. I ran it in '76 when it was new and had very good luck. I did see a noticeable operating temp drop and increased mileage. I must say my engine is running extremely cool. It rarely opens the t-stat even in 100+ weather. I am impressed.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-27-2012, 10:43 PM
Rich Kinsley Rich Kinsley is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Omaha/Ne
Age: 80
Posts: 760
Default

I ran it in '76 when it was new and had very good luck. [/QUOTE]

I meant when synthetic oil was new. Not my "64 Dodge :-)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-27-2012, 10:49 PM
aarracer aarracer is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 891
Default

Rich

Ah, yes. Do we see a dry sump system on that Competition engine. Not a fair comparison to a wet sump engine.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-27-2012, 11:03 PM
Rich Kinsley Rich Kinsley is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Omaha/Ne
Age: 80
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aarracer View Post
Rich

Ah, yes. Do we see a dry sump system on that Competition engine. Not a fair comparison to a wet sump engine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah on the 312 race engine but I even have a stock oil pan and pump on my poly. Some oiling mods were done which included drilling an extra oil hole in all the mains and blocking the valley area over the cam. I just had some serious headwork and a new cam installed which dropped my 4000 pound 4dr from 9.75 to 9.15 in the 1/8th. I also gained 7mph. It sure runs better with the proper set-up for my 2X4's. Stock heads and the smaller cam couldn't really use the extra carb. But it was great at cruise night :-)

I have not yet changed the tune from the original with the stock heads, etc.. I should be into the 8's with some tuning and trials. I'm having fun!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-28-2012, 11:55 AM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

Just seeing the oil pressure guage move up much quicker at startup
is good enough for me!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-28-2012, 04:17 PM
John Kunkel John Kunkel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NorCal
Age: 80
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cudabob496 View Post
Interesting aviation issue, however, the subject, as of late, does not seem to be of much interest in the car/engine community, since 99% of the auto performance community seems to be ok with synthetics.
And 500 years ago 99% thought the world was flat. I'm among the 99% that's OK with synthetics, just stating what's been found regarding drain off.


Quote:
Maybe all the more reason to use synthetics, since at startup they flow to the engine oiling areas much quicker than conventional oil.
Their ability to flow better fits in with the "runs off easier"
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-28-2012, 04:40 PM
cudabob496 cudabob496 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richland, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,018
Default

[QUOTE=Their ability to flow better fits in with the "runs off easier"[/QUOTE]


Perhaps, but ability to flow (viscosity), and adhesion to metal surfaces, are two different issues.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-02-2012, 03:48 PM
crisser crisser is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lafayette,la
Posts: 521
Default

I will use Valvoline VR1 for break in, and then will switch to this;

http://royalpurpleconsumer.com/produ...!hps-motor-oil
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Synthetic Oil? WFish Diesel & Turbo Diesel Chat 4 05-25-2003 01:04 PM
synthetic oil coupe32 Performance Talk 13 04-15-2003 09:37 AM
Synthetic Oil.... ram360 Ram Truck Chat 18 01-01-2002 01:35 AM
To synthetic or not to synthetic... That is the Question. MoparRam Ram Truck Chat 5 10-06-2001 01:24 PM
To synthetic, or not to synthetic? that is the question??? 01ramtuff Ram Truck Chat 13 09-28-2001 12:44 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .