Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2001, 10:29 AM
thehemi's Avatar
thehemi thehemi is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 309
Question Single vs Twin Turbo Setups

I can never seem to find a good physics-related
answer for this question. Is either one really
better than the other? Or are personal choices
and/or other factors best used to pick one?

My assumption is that single turbos are good
setups for inline engines, while twin turbos
are better for v engines. This being due to
the exhaust plumbing needs for a turbo.

In regards to general engine theory, is one of
the systems going to be more efficient than the
other? Does it depend on inline vs v config?

Anyone have links or articles with more info?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2001, 10:38 AM
TT440's Avatar
TT440 TT440 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Irving, TX
Age: 53
Posts: 159
Default

It really comes down to two things:
1) installation difficulties
2) cost

It can be a MAJOR PITA to cross the exhaust from one side to the other for a single turbo. On the other hand, it can be quite difficult to locate twins under the hood of some cars. Whatever fits is what ya run.

When you start pricing out turbos, a single large enough to do the trick can be VERY costly. Smaller engines aren't that bad, but a single large enough to feed my 440 was about $1800. I paid $572 each for my hybrids. Add in the $225 for the extra wastegate and I'm still bucks ahead.

For performance, it's pretty close. Twins can spool up faster, but assuming everythig is done properly, there will be no difference in power.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2001, 11:03 AM
dewme5 dewme5 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: panama city fl
Age: 48
Posts: 777
Default

you can't put a single on a hemi. it's sacralige.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2001, 01:15 PM
turbododge turbododge is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Minnesota,USA
Posts: 1,198
Default

The physics related issues that are usually brought up have to rotational inertia, which if I remember correctly is a squared function of radius. Thus it takes a single turbo longer to spool (more resistance to rotational speed change) than two small turbos of the same capacity.

The rule that I have heard the most is that a single will make more horsepower (less parasitic losses), and twins will spool faster and give better throttle response.

I do think the differences are not very large, and packaging and cost are the major factors. Very few of us have the access and money to do an unltimate dyno tune, which is what would be needed to see the difference in power. You might be able to feel a bit of difference in lag, however.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2001, 03:49 PM
thehemi's Avatar
thehemi thehemi is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 309
Default

TT440,

Was your car at the Houston Mopar Show? If
so, I remember speaking with you briefly at
the show on Saturday. Really sweet setup.

Were you able to find a twin turbo 440 kit?
How much hand-fabricating did you have done?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-17-2001, 04:08 PM
Duner Duner is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 481
Default

My single turbo set-up that I did on my Dakota is the only turbo'd vehicle I have ever driven or worked on. One thing I do know is that there is no perceptible turbo lag. Once the engine has any load on it at all it's at full boost. This may become more of an issue farther down the road, since I generally tow a trailer with the truck during the winter months. I guess the only way there could actually be less lag would be if it were in boost at all times.

Packaging was the main thing driving the decision for a single. There is just no room for twins without changing way too much stuff. Crossing the exhaust was no issue at all. Probably because it's in a truck. The bottom side of the thing has tons of room.... it's the top side with all the clearance issues.

Anybody have any good links to building a cheap air/water intercooler system?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2001, 08:49 PM
dewme5 dewme5 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: panama city fl
Age: 48
Posts: 777
Default

as far as turbo lag goes.. if you have any, it's more or less the time it takes for more power. you go WOT, and then the boost kicks in. it's not like you are losing any power in that time. it's just a slight delay before you get the benefits of boost over your normal power. turbo lag has always sounded like a response time between hitting the gas pedal, and your car starting to accelerate. Not so.. it's just the time before you go from 300 hp and jump up to 450 hp.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2001, 12:46 AM
TT440's Avatar
TT440 TT440 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Irving, TX
Age: 53
Posts: 159
Default

thehemi... That be me! I must say taht you've got me at a disadvantage. I spoke with bunches of folks and dunno which one you are.
A kit? {chuckling} Is there such a thing? I've thought about producing one.
It was 100% hand made. I must confess that I hired out the welding since I'm missing a welder. The system was designed in my head. That explains why it appears a wee bit lop-sided.

Duner... if you've got no lag, your turbine may be a bit small. I had no lag on my first pair of turbine housings. I stepped up to a larger set and now make bunches more power at the same boost. The spool up is a tad slower but the engine can now breathe at higher RPM.
Sometimes "lag" can be good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2001, 11:08 AM
thehemi's Avatar
thehemi thehemi is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 309
Default

TT440,

I was not expecting you to remember me.

The setup certainly had a more "utility" than
"fashion" appearance, and I prefer that look.
What good is a car that you cannot go drive?

Well, I guess there are -some- exceptions, one
being the guy that had the seriously clean '71
Hemi Cuda Convt 4-speed clone. Killer car!

Anyways, I think you guys have answered my
questions on the turbo issues. I am not in
the process of a turbo project, but just had
the ickling to find out the differences.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any DRAW-thru turbo setups here? dtpolk Slant Six Chat 1 04-02-2011 06:51 PM
440 Twin Turbo? Bagherra Performance Talk 20 12-02-2003 10:05 AM
TWIN TURBO /6? crooked Slant Six Chat 5 01-25-2003 10:21 PM
Twin Screw Supercharger or Twin Turbo? GQMarinePilot Power Adders 3 09-07-2002 06:50 PM
Twin Turbo V-10 Dak DAKRACER Dakota Truck Forum 12 06-27-2002 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .