Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Durango Chat

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2001, 03:48 PM
JAW JAW is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 46
Posts: 111
Question 180 deg. Thermostat

I called about getting my coolant flushed and I asked how much to put in a new thermostat. He went on about how if I put in a lower temp. thermostat that it was confuse the computer because it would run so much cooler, make it run rich, and burn a bunch more fuel. So what is the real deal here? I know most of you all have one. Any problems?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2001, 05:56 PM
openclasspro openclasspro is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Irwin,Pennsylvania
Age: 53
Posts: 1,054
Default did it on mine-01 ram

didn't add any more power too it-now that it's cooler out- i get a 1740 code-engine doesn't heat up to operating range quick enough-and also my od flutters around + and - 300rpms- fellow ram owner had same prob- dealer said it was do to the stat and pcm was confusing the tc on locking and unlocking-they put 195 back in and problem went away- if youare gonna do a pcm - change it- if not i wouldn't bother-my .02$-phil
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2001, 09:39 AM
Kevin_Rants's Avatar
Kevin_Rants Kevin_Rants is offline
Regular Guy
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,033
Default

I disagree, I've run a Robert Shaw 180 in my 95 Dak and 99 Durango, no problems. Most of the Dak guys run them also.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2001, 10:19 PM
Old guy's Avatar
Old guy Old guy is offline
But young at heart.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Prairieville, La.
Age: 75
Posts: 315
Default Openclasspro (Phil) is right but.......

notice that his truck is a 2001. JAW has a '99 like yours and mine, Kevin. The 180 will work just fine. I even ran a 160 in mine last winter and didn't get any codes. I went back to the 180 because I almost froze my butt off. Cab took too long to warm up with a 160. Computer and control systems are different evidently. There is no horse power gain by going to the 180 but it works well with my other modifications. Besides I am old and 180 was normal when I learned how to drive. 195 makes me nervous.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2001, 03:52 PM
2001 Durango R/T's Avatar
2001 Durango R/T 2001 Durango R/T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ontario/Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 346
Default

I was also told that if you put in the 180, the car won't pass the smog check as easily as the cat doesn't get hot enough. BS or not, who knows. I haven't heard of any significant gains with it, so I think that I would rather go with the IAT adjuster so that you can put it back to stock setting when you get your truck smogged.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2001, 09:08 PM
Old guy's Avatar
Old guy Old guy is offline
But young at heart.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Prairieville, La.
Age: 75
Posts: 315
Thumbs up Why not do both?

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2001, 12:39 PM
2001 Durango R/T's Avatar
2001 Durango R/T 2001 Durango R/T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ontario/Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 346
Default Re: Why not do both?

Quote:
Originally posted by Old guy
You know, every once and a while someone says something that's really in tune with the way we should do things! *LOL*
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2001, 04:13 PM
JAW JAW is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 46
Posts: 111
Default

It doesn't sound like the lower thermostat will do anything to performance unless you have a computer upgrade. I have also heard that emmisions could be a problem. Is there really any performance increase and why?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2001, 11:36 AM
Old guy's Avatar
Old guy Old guy is offline
But young at heart.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Prairieville, La.
Age: 75
Posts: 315
Default O.K. Here goes.......

I'll admit up front that people have said that the 180 doesn't add any performance including Kenne Bell that has put it on his dyno. I am hard headed sometimes. I still believe that lowering the block temperature 15 degrees has to have an effect on the incoming air charge and everyone knows that a cooler charge will yield better performance. I use 180 on all my vehicles.
As far as the polution testing goes, there is no sniff test in my area yet. My guess is that engine temp could only have an effect on the converter during initial warm up. With exhaust gases coming from the engine, the cat should get up to normal operating temp regardless of engine temp.

Note: This is my own line of thinking and if anyone disagrees, just have at it. You won't flame me up.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2001, 02:45 PM
JAW JAW is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 46
Posts: 111
Default

It would make sense that by lowering the engine temperature that you could put a denser charge into the ignition chamber (add more fuel in the same given space). The problem seems to me that the thermodynamic efficiency of an engine goes down as the temperature difference of the cycle goes down (the difference between the ambient temperature and the temperature in the combustion chamber). I believe that is why this could have an effect on the emmisions. As for performance, does anyone know that it does help? Is this just a useful additioin for the computer upgrade? What about the box every is using?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2001, 08:32 AM
Old guy's Avatar
Old guy Old guy is offline
But young at heart.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Prairieville, La.
Age: 75
Posts: 315
Default JAW

You are correct in the thermal effeciency of the engine. That is why the corporations switched to 195 from 180 a few years ago. With the higher effeciency the emissions go down and MPG goes up. In theory, effeciency and performance would go hand in hand but in practice the engine runs better for drag racing purposes if it is colder than optimum effeciency. I'm talking way over my head and repeating things I have been told by engineers. Don't ask me for a more technical explanation because my pea sized brain will probably melt and run out my ears.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2001, 01:36 PM
driftin4 driftin4 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bellingham Wa
Posts: 23
Thumbs up

I am running the 160 deg Hypertech Power Stat in my 5.9 with Water Wetter and have no problems.
Well, I would prefer a little more heat now that the temp is dipping below freezing.
It did get rid of my ping problem though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
70s 360 thermostat gasket go above or below thermostat? 73_RoadRunner Performance Talk 13 12-10-2008 02:31 AM
thermostat 99 Dodge Ram Truck Chat 4 05-29-2001 06:40 PM
Thermostat GQMarinePilot Ram Truck Chat 4 05-20-2001 08:12 AM
Thermostat ? ehostler Performance Talk 3 05-06-2001 10:18 PM
Which 180 Thermostat is best? TruckBoy95 Ram Truck Chat 2 04-11-2001 07:19 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .