|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
308's vs 302's on a 390 Stroker
I'm pondering doing a 318/390 stroker motor for my 1987 Gran Fury. With the weight, I need bottom end torque more so than top end. I've heard good things about both the 302's and the 308's, so I'm wondering which head combination (not ported) would be better:
308's with 2.02/1.60 valves, 308's with 1.88/1.60 valves or 302's with 1.88/1.60 valves Planned specs/usage: Street cruiser/sleeper - not all out racing Mopar 4" crank Diamond pistons (looking for around 9:1 compression) Hughes HER0814AL roller cam with 208/214 Duration @.050" and .480"/.489" lift 3.55:1 gears Cop car or Edelbrock performer intake 750 carb The exhaust will be the bottleneck, but I need to have a stock looking exhaust system to keep the emissions folks happy until 2007, when I can get historic tags: Cast iron 360 or 340HP exhaust manifolds, tied to a Flowmaster 2 1/4" X 3" Y-collector, 3" H-flow Cat, 3" Flowmaster muffler and a 3" tailpipe Thanks - RR |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
i would go for the bigger valves .....
390 cubes draws lots of air could bee a nice sleeper |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Ditto
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I would use the newer magnum heads but you can't use a roller cam with it.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks guys. - RR
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
308's
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Crank
Why not a roller cam? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stroker | jtmoney | Dakota Truck Forum | 63 | 10-02-2002 07:00 AM |
318 stroker | TrxR | Performance Talk | 26 | 09-13-2002 12:01 AM |
360 Stroker | TrxR | Performance Talk | 9 | 08-06-2002 08:22 AM |
360 stroker | bobbyg | Performance Talk | 1 | 05-27-2001 08:56 AM |
Eagle 'RB' 4.15 Stroker Crank VS. MP 4.15 Stroker Crank VS. Welded Stock Steel | krownman | Performance Talk | 5 | 03-04-2001 11:47 PM |