Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2002, 09:41 PM
dirty dan's Avatar
dirty dan dirty dan is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rockingham,nc
Posts: 1,027
Question whats the good ,bad and the ugly of it all

Whats the big differance between a 440 bored 60 over and a 400 bored 30 over with a 440 crank instaled. As I recall this would give both engines a 4.380 bore and matching stroke. As far as I can tell the only real differance is con rod length and of course rod ratio.
So what is the point ?
I have herd that these 400 stroked should be keeped or are at least ment to be used under 5500 rpm.
Is this accurate?
So tell me whats the good the bad and the ugly of these 400`s with the 440 cranks?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2002, 09:56 PM
PRO PRO is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Grand Junction,CO.USA
Posts: 1,573
Default

the real advantage is a shorter piston(shorter deck)which means lighter piston weight,usually 100+ grams (x8) or so,not to mention saving 15lbs in the block.......PRO....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2002, 10:54 PM
gotcha gotcha is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cabot, AR.
Posts: 312
Default

Dan.....a couple of ways to go. 400 block with 440 crank and 400 (383) rods. 400 block with 440 crank and 440 rods. The reciprocating weight (bobweight) total is the key. You have a shorter deck height on the 400 with a cut down crank, a lighter or the same rod (your choice) and a much lighter piston than a 440.

Next subject is strength.....the shorter deck 400 is physically stronger that the tall deck 440. Because the crank on the big block is secured near the center of mass the shorter the deck, the stronger the block with mains attached. Torsional rigidity and stability. Especially on nitrous. The oil demand on the cutdown crank is less because there is less surface area, and to a degree less friction.

The third consideration is the overall weight. The 400 block is about 20-30 lbs. lighter than the 440.

When swapping engines the shorter deck height helps in the overall width (valve cover to valve cover) and header clearance.

In almost every case the 400 combo will rev quicker and produce more HP and torque than the same cubic inch 440. I did not say rev higher, but quicker.

Now for the good part. You can now build a 496 to 505 440 for about $200-300 more money. Hughes engines is supposed to be building a 4.15 crank for about $300 to $400 plus your core.

This entire thing is based on what you have available to work with as far as basic parts. Blocks, cranks, etc. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
318?? whats a good setup?! 69ROADRUNNER69 Performance Talk 36 06-17-2003 11:45 PM
Whats A Good Toy? GROCERYGETTER Front Wheel Drive Chat 8 11-21-2001 05:29 PM
The bad, good, and ugly My427stang Ram Truck Chat 0 03-11-2001 09:40 PM
Hooker Aero Chamber mufflers good?Bad?Ugly? Dr. Righteous Performance Talk 24 12-10-2000 04:42 PM
Tonneau Cover Survey....the good, the bad, and the ugly :) RamThis Ram Truck Chat 14 11-14-2000 05:27 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .