Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2002, 08:39 AM
pro-street dart pro-street dart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lansdowne, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 149
Default I Need Help Deciding On Which Heads

I'm re-evaluing the heads that I have chosen for the stroker 340 I'm still in the process of collecting all the parts for, presently I have a pair of Mopar Performance - 340 HP Head - 2.02" intake / 1.60" exhaust - these heads are cast iron but feature the lastest in swirl port technology, 166cc intake volume, 18-degree valve angle. How would these compare to a pair of Edlebrock aluminun heads? (I assume Edlebrock would be a good choice.) Also I see Edlebrock sells two differents heads, the Performer and the Performer 340, for a stroker which ones a better choice??

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2002, 02:31 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

Although the high swirl is a great head for certain applications, I feel that they might be slightly on the small side for a stroker. I might be wrong though, I have underestimated their potential before. Just checked and there is only 5 cc difference in the intake port volumes between the E-brocks and your high swirls. I assume that you have measured them; I wouldn't rely on any number given by MP. I believe there is porting templates available for those heads and if I used those heads I would port them.The intake port in those heads tend to have a very large pushrod pinch; I would also remove as much of it as possible to gain some port window at that point. With the bigger displacement you can use all you can get. They are good heads and might be a good choice.

Edelbrocks is another moderately priced alternative. They perform well too. I would consider the RPM head, not the 340 RPM. The 340 RPM is amchined to an open chamber head because of the positive deck height of the early 340's and is specially meant for these engines. Using them in some other engines just makes some unnecessary hassle, more difficult to figure out the quench distance (clearance between the piston top and the chambers blamk side) This clearance should be set at .040" for good results and still be safe, of course this often recuires that the pistons have a D shaped dish in bigger displacement pump gas versions for proper CR, but this is the way the engine should be built. That's why I personally would prefer the Edelbrocks over the high swirls, since they are an open chamber design the proper quench is more dificult to achieve. A quench engine will tolerate mor CR than a non quench (starts to get worse after .040" and the quench is totally lost at .080") engine and therefore run better and make more power. Although there are well performing non qhuenchers too, I feel making it a quench engine is worth the extra work.

Sorry this became so long and slightly off the subject; personally I would pick the E-brocks for several reasons, lighter, repairable etc etc., but since you already have the high swirls that would make the choice way more difficult and I would propably end up using them. But you didn't mantion what kind of engine you are after and that's why I'm just assuming.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2002, 06:30 PM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

A stroker to 400+ciubes? No matter which one you have, port them out. I assume this is not a truck pulling engine.
The MP heads flow less than the Edel.'s in there as is cast condition.
For a good story , look at the current issue of Mopar Muscle.
The smog heads they ported are no slouch's.

The RPM Edel. heads are the same minus the extra machining on the 340 head in order to clear the positive deck pistons the early 340's had.
Do a search on Edel. heads. In the search, "Roger", a Edel. tech, tells you whats what.
The info is also in there catolog.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2002, 09:28 AM
Locomotion's Avatar
Locomotion Locomotion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 386
Question Attn: pro-street dart

If you are considering different cylinder head options, please e-mail me.
I have a question/suggestion/offer.
Myron

locomo@bellsouth.net
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2002, 09:50 AM
pro-street dart pro-street dart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lansdowne, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 149
Myron - Check your e-mail.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2002, 02:40 PM
Locomotion's Avatar
Locomotion Locomotion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 386
Gripe My ISP is acting up!

I wasn't able to send out an email but will try again later!

Myron
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2002, 02:47 PM
pro-street dart pro-street dart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lansdowne, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 149
Default

Ok! I'll watch for it. - Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i need help deciding what to do.. moparmanjt Vintage MOPAR chat 7 09-19-2006 12:27 AM
Help with deciding to buy 78 cordoba smite71 Vintage MOPAR chat 35 10-21-2004 03:42 AM
Deciding to sell ClassicDodge Vintage MOPAR chat 0 03-17-2003 12:07 AM
Need help deciding on whether to go with a diesel... 01ramtuff Diesel & Turbo Diesel Chat 18 11-25-2001 12:38 PM
help in deciding between two cars mmariak Restoring your MoPar (Tricks & techniques) 2 03-22-2000 03:49 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .