Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2003, 11:26 PM
kenkarner kenkarner is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: perkins,ok
Posts: 55
Default 413 help

I am about to start putting together a 413. I have flat top pistons for a 60's 413 to replace the dished pistons. Now have a set of small chamber heads with the bigger valves. What type of compression should I expect? Best cam to run? the crank is steel with larger bolt holes than the 440's. what problems will I find trying to hook up a flex-plate? Any and all suggestions will be helpful. It is going in a 48 special deluxe businessmans coupe. to be driven just for fun thanks Ken
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2003, 07:26 AM
NC PUTZER's Avatar
NC PUTZER NC PUTZER is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ROCKINGHAM, NC
Posts: 50
413 HELP

SOUNDS LIKE A REAL FUN PROJECT TO ME>>>>>>>

I WILL ASK DAN THE MOPAR MAN TO POST AN ANSWER TO YOUR REQUEST . HE WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH ME TODAY.>>>>

I AM ALSO CHANGING THE ENGINE IN A 1947 CHRYSLER NEW YORKER, CLUB COUPE.. THE COMPLETE DRIVE TRAIN WILL BE UPDATED TO 44O + 727>>>>>>RESTORATION IS IN PROGRESS WITH THE BODY REMOVED, 440 + 727 PLACED ON THE FRAME RAILS AND RUNNING GREAT.

YOU MAY BE ABLE TO HELP ME IN LOOKING FOR ANYONE WHO HAS CONVERTED ANY 8 CYL. CHRYSLER FROM DRUM TO DISC BRAKES USING THE ORIGINAL SPINDLES>>>>>>

ALSO, I AM LOOKING FOR A CENTER DUMP EXHAUST MANIFOLD, WITH CASTING NO. 2205536. THIS MANIFOLD HAS THE EXHAUST FLANGE EXACTLY IN THE MIDDLE, NOT AT THE REAR.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2003, 01:11 PM
kenkarner kenkarner is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: perkins,ok
Posts: 55
Default

I am using a s-10 sub-frame on mine to get disc set up. Sorry cant help with the manifold, ever thought about shortis headers?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2003, 04:56 PM
b-1ken b-1ken is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Islip,NY
Posts: 949
Default

Sounds like you have a pre 1962 engine. That crankshaft will not work with a 727 torqueflite. A later crank ('62 or newer 413, 426 or 440) will fit and I recommend you get one. I used to build 426"s (1/16" overbore) out of 413's and they work fine except the cylinder walls are not real thick and cracks were not uncommon (in a race engine). '68 or newer 383, 400, or 440 heads would work fine. If you're running on the street, I don't think a compression ratio of higher than 9.5 is wise (9.0 is safer).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2003, 07:47 PM
dirty dan's Avatar
dirty dan dirty dan is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rockingham,nc
Posts: 1,027
Default I agree

[QUOTE]Originally posted by b-1ken
[B]Sounds like you have a pre 1962 engine. That crankshaft will not work with a 727 torqueflite. A later crank ('62 or newer 413, 426 or 440) will fit and I recommend you get one. I used to build 426"s (1/16" overbore) out of 413's and they work fine except the cylinder walls are not real thick and cracks were not uncommon (in a race engine). '68 or newer 383, 400, or 440 heads would work fine. QUOTE]
I agree with b-1 ken
As I have a 62 413 with standard dimention holes.
If your engine has dish pistons in it ,then some one has already been there and done that.
I would also swap out those heads for some 452`s or something close to that in performance.
As those older heads had an alumanume rocker shaft pedistale.
This is a weak design in my opinion .
Because it puts a lot of stess on the longer rocker arm bolts ,that are required.
As for compresstion.
It would depend on the use of the engine,as to how much is needed.
Don`t get discoraged ,you still will have a solid setup to sart with.
It only requires some updateing thats all..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2003, 01:42 PM
6 packin's Avatar
6 packin 6 packin is offline
This account disabled due to bad email address!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Under my car!
Age: 48
Posts: 1,551
Default

Dan has a good point. The heads to my knowledge are inferior as to flow also. The 452's would be a way better head. Also the cranks are identical to the RB 440 and all of them are steel so use a neutral converter.
__________________
68 Coronet
69 Super Bee......new 500 cid comin soon!
73 Duster witha missing 440/727
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .