Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2003, 02:28 AM
charger_dan's Avatar
charger_dan charger_dan is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Age: 55
Posts: 448
Default Cam Lobe Profile: Solid vs. Hydraulic

Okay, you can file this question under "duh, I thought everyone knew that",
but here goes anyway:

Suppose you're comparing two cams: A solid cam and a hydraulic cam.
Both have lobes designed for the .904" Chrysler lifter, and they have
similar overall specifications (duration @ 50, lift, o/lap, etc).

Will both cams produce similar power in the same engine?
If they will differ, in what ways?

Or, stated another way - for a given lifter diameter, why do solid lifter lobes
tend to have a more aggressive profile than hydraulics?

Let's hear from some experts!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2003, 02:55 AM
fastmopars .inc's Avatar
fastmopars .inc fastmopars .inc is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: alberta
Age: 39
Posts: 462
Default dunno about experts

well, im no expert but i came across this question and might as well answer it as best i can.
i have heard as a general rule of thumb that if you take a hyd cam and a solid cam of the same specifications, the solid cam will make roughly 15% more hp. also the torque should rise a comparable amount and the power should come in sooner and last longer. the reasoning for this is the more accurate valve timing that can be had with a solid lifter.
also, more aggressive 'ramps' can be had with a solid cam because of the lifter's ability to handle more spring tension and much higher rpms, as well as follow the cam lobe that much more accurately.
roller lifters take the aggressiveness one step farther, with the most radical profiles available for a roller. also, take a cam with similar lift and duration specs in roller and solid form, and you will most likely notice much smoother operation from the roller. they tend to keep better idle qualities and such at the same duration.
now i wanna hear what cuda has to say =)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2003, 03:45 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

I do not believe in that 15%, that's whole lot. Hot ROd magazine made a test years ago with a chevy comparing hydraulic, solid and roller, and the solid had some gain over hydraulic, but it was pretty small. The roller, however was another story. The cams used were in the 280-290 degree range (two of each style). Personally I feel, that the lift used pretty much dictates the style of the cam & lifters used, unless you for a certain reason really want to use a certain type. That is, under 0.5" hydraulic, 0.5-0.6" solid, and above that a roller. Those are rough numbers, but shold give an idea of what I mean.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
solid lifters to hydraulic? SBMopar Vintage MOPAR chat 5 01-22-2009 09:30 PM
The age old debate. Hydraulic vs solid cams 73calroadrunner Performance Talk 18 02-23-2004 02:08 PM
451 cam size recommendation.Also hydraulic or solid? 72cuda Performance Talk 13 02-01-2001 12:54 AM
Solid or Hydraulic cam 440 demon Performance Talk 12 04-12-2000 03:30 AM
Cam Determining Lobe Seperation and Largest Hydraulic Cam Lift ChristianCuda Performance Talk 17 02-23-2000 04:02 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .