Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2003, 11:22 PM
Ted Bromback's Avatar
Ted Bromback Ted Bromback is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auburn, Ga.
Age: 77
Posts: 102
Question Roller Rocker Questions???????

Do they make roller rockers 1.5:1 or 1.6:1 that fit the stock rocker shafts on my 360 "j" heads? If so what else do you have to replace? and IS it much of a torque gain, and lastly about how much does it cost? A lot of Novice Questions......I expect to get some wild answers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2003, 12:37 AM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

Roller rockers and regular adjustable (Non roller) rockers are made in both ratio's. You may have to change your springs due to the new lift. Ex; Your springs are rated @ / for cams with a lift of .500. Your cam is .500 lift. There matched. OK fine now, until you use 1.6 rockers. To figure out our new lift, divide 1.5 (Standard rocker ratio) by the cams lift at the valve. Then multiply by 1.6 for the new lift.

.500 / by 1.5 = .3333333333
.33333333 X 1.6 = .533

Time for new springs.

Where do you stand now?

Torque and HP gains are small. The head must be able to use the new lift to its advantage or it is a small waste.

Mopar performance sells them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2003, 09:51 AM
Ted Bromback's Avatar
Ted Bromback Ted Bromback is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auburn, Ga.
Age: 77
Posts: 102
Lightbulb Thanks

I appreciate the calculation tip on that valve geometry.
I saw two different sets of aftermarket roller rockers on ebay, one by C.A.T. of Ca and another from GearsAreUs.com, and it appears that they might fit on the stock shafts(although they offer hardened shafts) and don't require different pushrods etc. Would this work on an "under 400HP" street engine. How about oiling?
On Dyno 2000 program they boost torque by 50 ft-lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2003, 07:39 PM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

50lbs. on a program isn't 50lbs. in real life. Use computer programs for comparing and outlooks. If you increase 50lbs. real world with this 1 upgrade, I would not be looking at cat products. Look to Crane or Harland sharp products. Race tested and approved for servere poundings.
"Cat" is made in China.


Oiling is done the usaual way. No problems with your oiling now is there? No need for trick or hollow pushrods. Just the correct length and ends on the pushrod.
The rockers have a different end to them then the regular Hyd. pushrods.
The Hyd. p-rods are balled on both ends.
The adjustable p-rods need a cup up top and a ball on the bottom. The cup up top of the the p-rod excepts the adjusting screw of the rocker.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2003, 07:58 PM
71383bee's Avatar
71383bee 71383bee is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 48
Posts: 654
Post

I have too contemplated roller rockers and unless you are going to the 1.6 ratio (Be sure you have the proper clearance!) they are not worth the high price for a mild performance street engine. For good Harland Sharps or Comp Pro Magnums they are around $400+. Even Hughes recommends sticking with the stock style rockers unless you are seriously going to be at the track more often. Check out there site i know he talks about it in there somewhere Heres a link www.hughesengines.com

Actually the stock shaft mount rockers are pretty stout and can take a darn good beating.

CAT rollers are from china and cuda will disown you!

Seriously though there are a few guys on here that were using them and I don't remember any complaints.

rumblefish makes a good point about you springs. Be sure that they match the requirements for your cam. This is far more important than going to rollers.

I look at it like this. Try out the stocks for know and if you have the clearance go for the 1.6 rollers at a later date when you have the dough. You don't need to mess with the heads to change rockers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-2003, 08:22 PM
451Mopar 451Mopar is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Age: 59
Posts: 1,831
Default

You can get both ratios in roller rockers. The Crane gold aluminum roller rockers, and most others only have a roller tip, they are not full rollers where they mount on the shaft. The Crane roller rockers are about $330 for the rockers and shafts, but because these are adjustable, you need to replace the pushrods for use with the rockers adjusters.

The higher ratio 1.6:1 rockers have more valve lift, and if the heads flow more air at the higher lift (they should if the cam lift is under 0.500") the engine should make more power. Some poer benifets may also come from being able to adjust the lifter pre-load, and the roller tips may reduce friction also. Also, the stock stamped rockers often have a true ratio less than 1.5:1.

The cautions of using higher ratio rocker arms relate to valve lift, you will need to check piston to valve clearance, valve guide to retainer clearance, valve spring coil bind, etc.

Because the higher ratio rockers move the pivot point of the pushrod closer to the inside of the rocker arm, the pushrods come close to hitting the inside of the pushrod holes where they go through the cylinder head. Mine cleared without modification, but I am using a fairly mild cam.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04-2003, 08:28 PM
jelsr jelsr is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dighton, Kansas
Age: 84
Posts: 1,253
Default

I have seen in this forum, somewhere, that the stock stamped rockers are not a true 1.5 but are closer to 1.4. Another thought is to be sure you won't have the valves and pistons smooching one another, it's not pretty. MP lists pushrods for hyd lifter and mech rocker combos.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-04-2003, 11:23 PM
Ted Bromback's Avatar
Ted Bromback Ted Bromback is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auburn, Ga.
Age: 77
Posts: 102
Exclamation Thanks

Thanks Men of Mopar. I've decided, too much money and trouble for what I need right now, but as usual, I learn a little more each day by reading all these posts.
Again, I appreciated it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roller rocker questions RAM MAN Ram Truck Chat 3 06-08-2002 10:39 PM
Adjustable roller rocker questions. If you have them, reply!!! Devilbrad Dakota Truck Forum 3 05-25-2002 04:31 AM
Adjustable roller rocker questions. If you have them, please respond. Devilbrad Ram Truck Chat 3 05-24-2002 06:14 PM
1.7 Roller Rocker questions NewBlackDak Ram Truck Chat 2 12-22-2001 02:30 PM
Mopar 1.6 Roller Rocker Questions Blue97Dak Ram Truck Chat 3 01-09-2001 03:26 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .