|
|
|
|||||||
|
#1
09-30-2003, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Roller Rockers vs. Stamped in a 360
Yes, I've used the search function.
Are these a waste of money? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2433723860 I would think that you get a better rocker ratio (I've heard stock ration is below 1.5), reduce friction, and have a more solid valve train. I would be putting these in a 360 with a currently unknown cam. Thanks, Don 
|
|
#2
09-30-2003, 06:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there in good shape, then yes. Go for it. Use the correct length pushrod and your off.
|
|
#3
09-30-2003, 08:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I bought some for my 440, I have not tried them yet, but they will be fitted this weekend. It would likely be better to deal directly with CAT. The guy I got mine from on E-bay took 2 months to send mine cause Cat had them back ordered so he was selling stuff he didn't have yet......
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 47 and 58 Stamped Rockers? | BlackAce | Performance Talk | 2 | 05-04-2009 12:01 PM |
| 1.6 rockers in a 383 are they direct replacement for the stamped steel 1.5's | keng | Performance Talk | 7 | 07-09-2002 05:06 AM |
| Roller rockers vs regular adjustable rockers | 65 racer | Drag Racing Forum | 2 | 04-27-2001 12:49 AM |
| Roller rockers vs regular adjustable rockers | 65 racer | Performance Talk | 2 | 04-26-2001 03:07 AM |
| Rockers: roller tipped alone VS full roller | MopART | Performance Talk | 8 | 01-28-2000 07:00 PM |
Linear Mode
