Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2003, 06:51 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default Strange (lack of) performance 318

Hi Mopar experts...

I have a 1986 5th Avenue which I have had about 2 weeks now. And theres something really odd with the performance.

I'm sitting at the lights, they go green, I squeeze the gas quite hard and off she goes. Not rocketship speeds, but hey, its a stock '86...

So I'm cruising along at 35 with my little toe just tickling the gas pedal. I want to accelerate out to pass some guy or merge onto a faster road, so I stick the gas pedal down and nothing happens! The car slowly drags itself up 1 MPH at a time until its doing about 50-55 and then it wakes up and goes.

It almost feels like driving a turbo car with a load of lag.

Sometimes she won't pull hard from a rolling start either, like at a junction where you slow down, roll up and hit the gas again at 5 mph or so. Not so bad as the symptom above, but sluggish performance. And yes, it kicks down OK.

Now if it wasn't for the fact that it CAN pick up and go well, I might be tempted to put it down to damned smog era junk, but this can't be right.

The car has had a fresh service just before I got it (I checked the filters, plugs and wires all appear to be new). I peered down the throat of the carb and thats all clean like a new pin. One of the reasons I bought the car was the motor all looked real clean and well kept...

Cheap solutions are best as I'm trying to get the cash together for disc brakes for my Fury!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2003, 06:56 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

Oh yeh, theres no "symptoms" either. Its doesn't splutter, run rough, back fire, or anything. It just "goes slow"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2003, 07:00 AM
NZ 440R/T's Avatar
NZ 440R/T NZ 440R/T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 41
Posts: 4,848
Default

My Challenger had the same kind of thing, I would be doing 15-20mph and floor it, it would kickdown then kind of shut off then slowy work its way up to speed.
It will be your chamber not feeding fuel through properly, too much air
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2003, 08:41 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

Sorry to sound a little dumb here, the "chamber"? You're suggesting its leaning out basically, so is this to do with the lean burn system / carb?

The damned engine is covered in pipes I can hardly see it! Not used to this...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2003, 10:19 AM
NZ 440R/T's Avatar
NZ 440R/T NZ 440R/T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 41
Posts: 4,848
Laugh

Sorry to say mate, but I don't exactly know myself.......Only what the problem is, not how to fix it But I'm sure a carb Guy will be able to help I wouldn't mind learning as well
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2003, 10:47 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Re: Strange (lack of) performance 318

Quote:
Originally posted by 68fury
Hi Mopar experts...

I have a 1986 5th Avenue which I have had about 2 weeks now. And theres something really odd with the performance.

I'm sitting at the lights, they go green, I squeeze the gas quite hard and off she goes. Not rocketship speeds, but hey, its a stock '86...

So I'm cruising along at 35 with my little toe just tickling the gas pedal. I want to accelerate out to pass some guy or merge onto a faster road, so I stick the gas pedal down and nothing happens! The car slowly drags itself up 1 MPH at a time until its doing about 50-55 and then it wakes up and goes.

It almost feels like driving a turbo car with a load of lag.

Sometimes she won't pull hard from a rolling start either, like at a junction where you slow down, roll up and hit the gas again at 5 mph or so. Not so bad as the symptom above, but sluggish performance. And yes, it kicks down OK.

Now if it wasn't for the fact that it CAN pick up and go well, I might be tempted to put it down to damned smog era junk, but this can't be right.

The car has had a fresh service just before I got it (I checked the filters, plugs and wires all appear to be new). I peered down the throat of the carb and thats all clean like a new pin. One of the reasons I bought the car was the motor all looked real clean and well kept...

Cheap solutions are best as I'm trying to get the cash together for disc brakes for my Fury!
Just picked up a loaded 88 5th last Monday for 625. It even has leather. I stole that sucker. It's a little slugish too unless you really get on it. When I put the plateon it I ran my hand under the exhaust. Plenty of flow, but it was hotter than hell. Clasic case of the cat converter stopping up after running for 15 years. Just have it hoolowed out or removed all together and your power will return and your mpg will improve too. Let me know if you have any more questions about it. I'll be glad to help you out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:05 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

About the only good thing about living in this over-taxed nanny state country (UK) is that we have no requirement to run a catalytic converter prior to 1992 model cars. I already plan to junk it, along with any other emissions "crepe" on the car as mileage is important (at nearly $6 per gallon, you bet it is!)

I'm tied into a couple of other projects so I don;t want to be pulling too much off the 5th or getting it all in bits as its my daily driver.

I'll pull the cat and slip a flexi over it, and see if I can't loose some of this other stuff too.

What else is an "easy win" to junk? So long as I can run a nice clean burn I'll pass emissions so no worries on that.

I'm suspicious about the carb, just because I hear its computer controlled on this model? My budget just now doesn't hold out for another one but can I improve on what I got (in nice easy one afternoon steps)?

Apart from being a little lazy on pick-up its running real clean, real smooth and real reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:12 AM
dave571's Avatar
dave571 dave571 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: carstairs,alberta,canada
Posts: 2,809
Default

The converter is a good place to look.

I'm assuming the vehicle has had a pampered life, as such, it probably hasn't been matted much. It could simply be, that the secondary fuel bleeds are plugged from lack of use.

You stomp it, the secondary throttle plates open, and bring lots of air, but no fuel.

Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:14 AM
NZ 440R/T's Avatar
NZ 440R/T NZ 440R/T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 41
Posts: 4,848
Laugh

Quote:
Originally posted by dave571
You stomp it, the secondary throttle plates open, and bring lots of air, but no fuel.
Thats what I was meaning
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:21 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Quote:
Originally posted by 68fury
About the only good thing about living in this over-taxed nanny state country (UK) is that we have no requirement to run a catalytic converter prior to 1992 model cars. I already plan to junk it, along with any other emissions "crepe" on the car as mileage is important (at nearly $6 per gallon, you bet it is!)

I'm tied into a couple of other projects so I don;t want to be pulling too much off the 5th or getting it all in bits as its my daily driver.

I'll pull the cat and slip a flexi over it, and see if I can't loose some of this other stuff too.

What else is an "easy win" to junk? So long as I can run a nice clean burn I'll pass emissions so no worries on that.

I'm suspicious about the carb, just because I hear its computer controlled on this model? My budget just now doesn't hold out for another one but can I improve on what I got (in nice easy one afternoon steps)?

Apart from being a little lazy on pick-up its running real clean, real smooth and real reliable.
Dont use a flex pipe in the exhaust. It will hurt the fow due to the fact it gets it to spinning inside the pipe and the velocity slows down. On most of these if it just has one cat you can drop the pipe and take a pry bar and hammer and beat the inside out of it. If not take it to a muffler shop and get them to cut a pipe for you to install you self if you like, but dont use the flex stuff. The air pump and all of it's lines can go too as well as the egr valve, but I doubt it will pick up much milage that way. Loosing the cat will gain you the most.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-23-2003, 03:05 PM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

OK folks I see a plan forming

de-cat it with a proper pipe, strip & clean carb, junk the air pump if I have time

Thanks all!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:44 PM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Welcome, anytime.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:54 PM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

Does it have a 4bbl carb on top?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-24-2003, 12:03 AM
71RR's Avatar
71RR 71RR is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Columbus,OH
Age: 48
Posts: 343
Default

Good luck with it, remember they only have 140 horsepower and weigh just under 2 tons. An Aries/Reliant with the 2.2L has a better weight to horsepower ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-24-2003, 09:20 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

Thanks for reminding me of that 71RR!

I think mine is 160 or so though as its 4 barrel and got they 9:1 CR for '86. Still, not exactly a quarter mile warrior!

Its not the number of the horses that counts though. When it behaves it goes quick enough to beat stuff like a Mondeo away from the lights, they are 140 BHP and only about a ton. I guess its the torque that counts for city driving.

Its a nice winter car, it'll do. Compared to the kind of **** British / European junk I could have got for the same money (Volvo 740, BMW 520, Ford Scorpio) I'm happy to put up with the flaws the 5th Ave has. Come summer I might consider having a proper play with it (when I'm done spending money on the Fury)

My '68 Sport Fury has the 318 two barrel and weighs more than 2 tons and is quicker than the 5th Ave. IIRC its about 220 BHP?

Might just have to pull the 318 from the Fury, drop it in the 5th and get a proper motor for the Fury.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-25-2003, 09:27 AM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

The reason I sked if it had a 4bbl is if it's secondarys are opening at part throttle to cause bad mileage.
Whats a Ford Scorpio? Have a picture?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-25-2003, 10:02 AM
GaryS GaryS is offline
This account disabled due to bad email address!
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Argyle, Texas
Age: 82
Posts: 680
Default

My '85 5th Ave was the same way. It's just they way they have it set up for mileage. Between rear end gearing, torque converter and spark control, it was a slug until RPM's built up...but it did get 25 mpg on trips.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-26-2003, 05:47 AM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

dunno if I can insert inline images but here goes:

This is the Ford Granada Scorpio Mk3



This is the Ford Scorpio



They are both the same car really but restyled and the "Granada" name bit dropped in 1992 or 1993.

Its RWD, power comes from a gutless 2.0 litre through to a quite hot 24V V6 2.9 liter by Cosworth. Also a 2.5 turbo diesel which IIRC is made by Peugeot in France. Its the same size as the 5th Ave prety much. Its kind of the British Crown Victoria. Big RWD cars are not popular here any more so Ford dropped it about '99 and it was not replaced. Biggest ford is now the FWD Mondeo.

Resale on these is appauling. You can buy a good '95 Scorprio Ultima for the price of a '90 Toyota!

-

GaryS - Thanks, you are confirming what I had suspected all along! Upgrades comeing as cash allows!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-26-2003, 12:11 PM
rumblefish360's Avatar
rumblefish360 rumblefish360 is offline
Moparchat Bronze member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: C
Age: 57
Posts: 11,120
Default

68fury;
Thanks. That looks alot like a Contour, or Taurus. The Taurus is big and the Contour is mid sized. The Taurus is popular here.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-26-2003, 02:03 PM
68fury's Avatar
68fury 68fury is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 54
Posts: 191
Default

Aha, the Contour is called the Mondeo in Europe.

Rumour has it we were going to get the Taurus to replace the Granada/Scorpio range but it never happened. Vauxhall have just dropped the Omega (the car which is kinda the same base vehicle as the Holden Monaro on which the new Pontiac GTO is based) so thats the end of the line for mainstream RWD sedans over here unless you go BMW/Mercedes/Jaguar and thats a price level up.

MG-Rover have got with the program though. They have converted their comfy FWD "75" sedan to RWD and are buying 4.6 liter V8s from Ford for it. No price yet but its targetted at the BMW 540 and M5. Go MG-Rover, time to kick Bavarian ass

Shame they couldn't have got hold of the 5.7 Hemi for it...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Everybody underwhelmed by lack of performance parts for th 4.7? Walkercolt Dakota Truck Forum 8 04-18-2008 09:31 PM
oil pressure... or lack of creative1 Performance Talk 4 12-07-2004 12:14 PM
Lack of power 03 Neon Neon Club Chat 1 10-17-2004 09:18 PM
lack of 3.9 performance parts mitymopr Dakota Truck Forum 3 08-24-2000 02:32 AM
Lack of Sebring performance Mopar Man Front Wheel Drive Chat 0 06-24-1999 03:34 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .