Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2004, 10:23 PM
nmdart nmdart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melrose NM
Posts: 150
Default which is better X or H

Finally got my 74 swinger up and running, Fresh 318 with MP 484/284 cam, ported 302 heads with 1.88/1.60s, Rpm Air gap, Hedman headers and 2600 stall. I am going to run deltaflow 40s with 2.5 inch pipe, which would be better for all out performance an X or an H pipe? Also I have talked to the local muffler shop about exiting in front of the rear tire, they told me this is not wise, what are your opinions on this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2004, 10:51 PM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

A merge type X pipe is the only way to go. In all test it will always produce a large gain in torque and some increase in Hp. An H pipe has to be properly placed and sized for the engine used including cam and header selection too. Some times an H pipe will show no gain, little gain, and sometimes a loss. Even at an H pipes it's best, the X pipe will beat the H pipe.

Side exit is not a good idea. It heats the tires and with each heat cycle it gets them closer to the end of there life. Fumes can be pulled back into the car along with blackening the side of the car.

A set of X,J, or U heads with 2.02 valves would be a much better set up too with the right dual pattern cams. Small blocks like the dual pattern cams better than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2004, 01:08 AM
Slingshot383's Avatar
Slingshot383 Slingshot383 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Age: 67
Posts: 533
Default

The X pipe is better than the H pipe, and you want to try to get 12" of pipe after the muffler. It helps with the harmonics and will make the system a lot quiter than with less pipe after the muffler.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2004, 09:15 PM
nmdart nmdart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melrose NM
Posts: 150
Default

Thanks for the info guys I am going to put an X pipe on it and run it out the back. I cant wait to get this thing on the street.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2004, 10:46 PM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

Welcome, anytime. One other thing, don't use a muffler shops home made X pipe either. It needs to be smooth and contoured and a speed shop piece is the way to go. Go to www.drgas.com for all the answers on X pipes from the guys that came up with them to start with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2004, 05:03 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

Since importing those pieces here is pretty expensive, I contacted one manufacturer and asked him about doing the X myself when I purchased some other parts. He said it shouldn't be a problem, just slice 1/3 of the pipe diameter on the center of two 90 degree mandrel bends and weld them together. In my previous car, I converted from 3.5" individual duals to a 3.5" x pipe and in that case picked nothing. But it makes the sound more pleasant to my ears.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:13 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

That's because you don't need any more than 2.5" pipes unless you make more than 600 hp at the flywheel. That's why you did not see any gains. The homemade X pipe wont make as much power as a production model.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:26 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

I made 780 hp through 3" duals & mufflers, but I had a very marrow operating range at teh strip because fo a slipping converter, and that may be one reason why there was no difference. Currently I have a 3" X set up with four mufflers with the engine and it works great & is quiet. If it is built the same as a factory built X, it should perform the same, wether it's done at home or in a factory shouldn't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:29 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

Well, most homemade joints are not as smooth or bent as well as a production piece. At least the ones I have seen. Mandrel bends help the flow a lot and ther fewer the better. I've seen some pretty crappy stuff before, that's why I said go with a production piece.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-28-2004, 05:45 PM
Stus300 Stus300 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 97
Default

mandrel bend pipes from home depot Nuff Said.

production pipe if you can find it, be easier for install..

jsut member to measure twice cut once =)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-28-2004, 09:25 PM
nmdart nmdart is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melrose NM
Posts: 150
Default

The shop that is going to do it is also a custom rod shop and their x is pretty nice, looks like a smooth free flowing piece. Thanks for all the info. I will let you know how it turns out, going to the shop tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .