Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2005, 07:57 PM
dusterbd's Avatar
dusterbd dusterbd is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ablemarle, nc
Age: 42
Posts: 938
Default lower control arm bushings

OK, buddy of mine and i are in a discussion about lower control arm bushings in all poly suspension setups. all other parts stock. figure id stick it out for all to read.

When using the poly lower control arm bushings, they never seem to sit correctly. the control arm does not locate completely tight to the K-frame, leaving a gap that varies from car to car. we agree that this cannot be good for maintaining alignment, bumpsteer, and ackerman throughout the suspension travel.
he says that this can cause the torsion bar and lower control arm to move during braking and cornering. id have to agree with that.

the controversy comes in here. i say that its that the strut rod bushings are actually thicker than the rubber that was replaced, causingthe strut rod to be at a different location, pulling the bushing in the lower control arm out of whack. its fixed by an adjustable strut rod.
he says that the problem is not in the strut rod, it lies in the bushing design itself, and to replace it with a stock shelled rubber bushing.

so now weve been standing in his driveway looking at his duster and his neighbors demon for a week, and were at a stalemate.
help us out, we have a case of girl scout cookies riding on this.
thanks
michael
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2005, 08:28 PM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

Both of you are wrong. Go to www.firmfeel.com and you will see the extra ;iece that is needed when installing polly bushings in the lower control arm. You just installed them and left out a piece that you did not buy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2005, 08:31 PM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

Matter of fact, here's the exact link you need. It shows the adjustable strut rod and greasable pin.

http://www.firmfeel.com/adjstrut_b.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2005, 08:54 PM
bbeckwith's Avatar
bbeckwith bbeckwith is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dunedin, Florida
Posts: 1,491
Lightbulb

DWC43,

That's pretty cool setup that FirmFeel has there. When I did my front end using Poly stuff, I questioned the manufacturer about this very problem and they suggested I grind the strut rod bushings down, (which I did with a belt grinder) to get the lca in the proper position on the pivot, so I would tend to agree with DusterBD that the strut rod bushings are the culprit here. While my method works for cheap, those adjustable strut rods are a cool item, but I'm not sold on it being necessary when you can just trim the strut rod bushings you have already. However, when money is not a problem, I would think these the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2005, 11:35 AM
dusterbd's Avatar
dusterbd dusterbd is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ablemarle, nc
Age: 42
Posts: 938
Default

DWC: on the link you gave me, it said that the bushings were thicker, necessitating the adjustable strut rod. so what benefit, other than greasability, do the lower contol arm shafts have? thanks for the link. i didnt realise that they had that info on there.
michael.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2005, 01:52 PM
swingin72's Avatar
swingin72 swingin72 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 110
Default

I ran into this same problem when doing my 72 Dart. The LCA doesn't want to go far enough forward. I actually assembled it that way and have driven it for 2 years with no problems. One of these days I should tear it apart and trim the strut rod bushing. It is, in fact, too long of a strut rod with the new bushings installed. My LCA sat about 1/2" too far back. I can definitely feel some "wander" from time to time, just don't feel like taking it back to the alignment shop after doing it over...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:20 AM
Clair's Avatar
Clair Clair is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dusterbd
When using the poly lower control arm bushings, they never seem to sit correctly. the control arm does not locate completely tight to the K-frame, leaving a gap that varies from car to car... i say that its that the strut rod bushings are actually thicker than the rubber that was replaced, causingthe strut rod to be at a different location, pulling the bushing in the lower control arm out of whack. its fixed by an adjustable strut rod.
he says that the problem is not in the strut rod, it lies in the bushing design itself, and to replace it with a stock shelled rubber bushing.
michael
You're right, the strut rod bushing (in every case I've seen) is basically a piece of poly that was, at best, molded from an original rubber piece. Since the poly doesn't compress like the rubber did, you end up with strut rods that are longer than they need to be when properly torqued. This was killing me on my Valiant... couldn't keep it aligned (I do my own), and the car was twitchy most of the time. Nail the brakes hard, and it firmed up a little, but not for long.

When I installed my Viper calipers, I tore the LCA's off and replaced the rear strut rod bushing with a cut-down version of the same piece. I first measured the distance from the LCA to the strut rod mount in the K with the LCA fully seated against the K. Fortunately, it came out to be exactly the same side to side, so no other problems there. Then I knew how long the strut rod and rear bushing had to be, accounting for a little crush. I fabbed it all up, trimmed the bushing down as necessary, plugged it all back together, and whaddyaknow, I've got 3.7* of +caster, 0.75* of -camber, just a hair of toe in, and IT STAYS THAT WAY. The car is a joy to drive now.

All that said, the Mopar LCA bushing rubber is so thin, I don't really think there is much benefit to going to poly in that spot. I mean, unless you just want to, that is. My car's got poly all over, front and rear, but on a more regular car, I'd go with rubber in the LCA. And your buddy is partially right... putting rubber in the LCA will hide a lot of the strangeness of the poly SRB's. I know, I had the same SRB's (as in, re-used them) in my previous suspension with all rubber bushings except the SRB's. No problems there, only when I went to the poly LCA bushings.

Another perk of the rubber bushings is that they add spring rate to the suspension. Since the rubber is bonded to the steel shell, and the shell is pressed on to the shaft, the rubber has to twist, not slide, when it moves. THe bushing acts like a spring. Ehrenberg popped off with a number like 20#/inch, and that's a bunch on a limp stock suspension. If you don't bump up your t-bars when you go poly, you may notice the suspension is softer. That's about twice the difference as going from 0.890" (383/440) bars to 0.920" bars.

Clair
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:25 AM
fastback340's Avatar
fastback340 fastback340 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bethel Ct
Age: 46
Posts: 702
Default

Yup the strut bushings are to thick. I was unaware of this problem till a few months ago. Now my lower control arm bushings are toast. Im gonna swap in Rubber LCA bushing this time and I have a set of Adj. strut rods to go on aswell.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:39 PM
dusterbd's Avatar
dusterbd dusterbd is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ablemarle, nc
Age: 42
Posts: 938
Default

hmm.... rubber bushings effectively add spring rate?
thats a ton cheaper than going up another few steps in torsion bars in my car.....
thanks for all the info. ill let him see the pics.
also, on a related topic, will the lower control arms, whes still using all poly bushings and having the lower control arms located properly via the strut rods, still move back and forth under hard maneuvering?
thanks for all the help guys. looks like im not getting my girl scout cookies though....
michael
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:41 PM
dusterbd's Avatar
dusterbd dusterbd is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ablemarle, nc
Age: 42
Posts: 938
Default

clair: could you by any chance give me the dimensions for those strut rod bushing modifications?
thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lower Control Arm Bushings Dick PT Cruiser Chat 25 01-03-2013 06:17 PM
Question: Lower Control Arm Bushings Fast_Eddie Restoring your MoPar (Tricks & techniques) 3 11-01-2004 01:26 PM
lower control arm bushings dusterbd Performance Talk 2 11-08-2002 05:08 PM
Daytona lower control arm front bushings dodgedaytonaman Front Wheel Drive Chat 4 12-24-2001 01:21 AM
Control Arm Bushings Help? cudacarl Performance Talk 4 10-31-2001 12:40 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .