Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2005, 09:52 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default 68 340 compression problem

I think I might have a problem. My 340 was completely gone through and rebuilt by a reputable machine shop 10 years ago. It was bored .040 The engine is in a street rod and only has 9000 miles on it. I had the car painted last summer and had the engine out so I had the heads freshened up with new valve guides and the 3 angle valve job. I just checked the compression and it is 145 lb in 7 cylinders and 140 in one with the engine warm. Before the valve job it was about the same. I thought it was leaking valves but now I'm thinking rings. This engine should have more than 145 lbs of compression shouldn't it? I believe the engine specs say it should have 180lb plus or minus 20lb. The car does not smoke. Do you think Ive got some weak sealing rings going on here or what? Any suggestions? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2005, 11:54 PM
70AARCuda 70AARCuda is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: las vegas nv
Age: 70
Posts: 522
Default

What are the specs on the camshaft as it has an effect on cranking compression, also was the carb held at WOT during the cranking.

I personally dont see anything wrong with it. All the cylinders are close to each other.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2005, 12:48 AM
racintracy's Avatar
racintracy racintracy is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Benld, IL
Age: 60
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70AARCuda
What are the specs on the camshaft as it has an effect on cranking compression, also was the carb held at WOT during the cranking.

I personally dont see anything wrong with it. All the cylinders are close to each other.
My thoughts exactly. 5 lbs. difference is no problem. And a hotter cam than stock can have lower cranking compression. Also if the cam isn't degreed in the cranking compression could show lower than expected.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:01 AM
dave571's Avatar
dave571 dave571 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: carstairs,alberta,canada
Posts: 2,809
Default

That variation is well within any real specifications.

Usually the worst only needs to be within 80 % of the best for most manufacturers. In your case, that would leave the lowest at only 116, with the highest at 145. The car would still be considered tunable with that dreadfull of a number, so what you have is fabulous.

Lots of variables as to the cranking pressure.
-altitude
-cam specs
-wide open throttle
-good battery for cranking
-good starter
-all the plugs out while cranking
-engine up to operating temp

yadda yadda yadda
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2005, 07:34 AM
dwc43's Avatar
dwc43 dwc43 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shelbyville,Tn.
Age: 54
Posts: 23,987
Biggrin

I agree with these guys too. It's good to go. BEt you put a big cam in it didn't ya ??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2005, 04:27 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default

The cam is a hughes 1423 flat tappet cam. I believe it has 213 223 duration and a 480 504 lift. I believe the centerline is 108. The cam was degreed in. Yes I had had the throttle wide open when I was cranking the engine over. I read the stock specs and when I saw 180 I thought something must be wrong..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2005, 05:20 PM
23T's Avatar
23T 23T is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Age: 77
Posts: 973
Default

Did you put in oil in the clys before the check?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2005, 07:21 PM
coupe32's Avatar
coupe32 coupe32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: newburgh in
Posts: 300
Default

No I did not put oil in the cylinders. I just warmed the engine up to operating temperature and then removed the spark plugs and checked the compression. I had the wife in the car to do the cranking and holding the throttle open while I checked each cylinder. All cylinders were the same 145 lb except one that was 140.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
915 vs. 906 compression problem sundrop_440 Performance Talk 7 04-02-2006 12:07 PM
440 compression problem 340-1 Drag Racing Forum 11 03-22-2004 11:01 AM
Low Compression Problem (long) Florida_70Bee Performance Talk 11 12-01-2001 01:40 AM
LOW COMPRESSION + A BLOWER, OR HIGH COMPRESSION AND NO BLOWER. I HAVE A 440 moparman1971 Drag Racing Forum 2 02-18-2001 01:39 PM
compression ratio vs. compression BB 70gtx Performance Talk 3 10-11-2000 05:02 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .