Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide!



Go Back   Moparchat - Home of MOPAR enthusiasts worldwide! > Technical Forums > Performance Talk

Click here to search for Mopar cars and parts for sale.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2005, 06:00 AM
plydus340's Avatar
plydus340 plydus340 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: marlow oklahoma
Age: 61
Posts: 229
Default 65 cuda w/ 440?

Hey guys, Does anybody know if my set-up will go in a 65 cuda (see set-up below). I wonder if the cppa headers will fit. How about tilt front ends for a 65 cuda? I wrecked the duster ( second gear got away from me, and I killed a brick mailbox with the ass-end) but I found a decent 65 cuda. Needs a decklid and a left front fender. Let me know what you guys think,... Thanks for any, and all replys
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2005, 06:28 AM
sbuc72's Avatar
sbuc72 sbuc72 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ontario/Canada
Posts: 254
Default

I think the 65 Cuda's have the narrow engine bays (i could be wrong, but my memory usually serves pretty well), a 440ci in there would be very tight, fenderwell headers would likely be a must.

Anyone have the dimensions between the strut towers on these ol' Abody's?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2005, 08:11 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

The frame rails and inner fenders in early A-bodies ('66 & older) have about 1.5" lesss space between them. Underchassis headers like TTI's or Schumachers are no can do. I have had a couple of those cars with RB engines, both utilized self made fenderwell headers. The other even had the inner fenders intact, but had had the engine moved slightly forward. Some ready fenderwells made for '67 and later might be pretty easy to fit in to the early cars, but I built my own. The trans tunnel is a bit too small for a 727 if the engine is reatained in the stock position, some clearancing may be required and is not a bad idea for maintenance anyway. Of course you need brakes in the car that can handle the power, heavy duty suspension is a plus, you need bigger rear axle for longevity and better cooling system. Despite of all this hassle, it's very well worth doing. Here is a pic of my old '66's engine bay, the inner fenders were removed and new ones built from aluminum and the right side shock tower modified slightly to make more room.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2005, 05:33 PM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

Yeah, what DartGT said. Ill add that ProParts (Mazzolini) semi fenderwell headers are about as close to a bolt in as I have found, just section the #8 tube about 2 inches and figure out the driver side pitman arm/torsion bar setup. If you go all out and add a tilt-up, go with coils up front and ditch the torsion bars, plenty of room to be had without those pesky bars! Might as well get some custom shock braces fabbed and remove the inner fenders as well. With all that new room, I bet a cheapy set of B-Body blackjacks would fit with little mods. The 383/400 is a bit narrower and those ProParts fit them a little worse as the 4/6 tubes hit the oil pan rail, a little dinging would fix that. Clearance under the car is going to be tight unless you mod the trans crossmember to have a cutout on the passenger side as well as the driver side. My 3 inch collectors are about 3 inches off the ground where they go under the stock cross member. The tunnel has to be clearanced where the seam is with a big hammer, or a custom tunnel would work, just be sure you weld the whole thing in as it is an integral part of the frameless chassis. A 4 speed tunnel is a little bigger. Get a better radiator too. 3/4 core wall to wall out f a Cherokee is what I run with a big fan (watch the trans lines!) and a pusher up front. No power brakes or power steeing unless you run headers like Dart's. Hi-Po manifolds are about a 9 out of 10 fit, just grind down the steering column where you think it might hit and change the ball and socket coupler to a slimmer U-joint or a straight coupler. I ended up spacing the K with 3/4 nuts and it helped alot with tunnel clearance. Tie the subframes together and get a better rear. You cant tub the rears unless you remove the backseat or section that as well. Not the easiest chassis to do this with, but probably one of the lightest! Ill post a recent pic of my 451 '65 A tonight for examples.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2005, 05:50 PM
plydus340's Avatar
plydus340 plydus340 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: marlow oklahoma
Age: 61
Posts: 229
Cool answers. Just what I was needing to hear. The more I think about that little 65, the more I like the idea. I figure you gotta be nuts to put a 440 in duster, a 65 cuda is just that much worse. I'd like to put the coil overs on front, and loose the t-bars, put a new tunnel in it. It would be cool to move the engine back. Roll cage, tubs, 4-link, well, I could go on and on...
Can't wait for the pics! Got any times so I can get an idea? Thanks for the replys guys!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:06 PM
ehostler's Avatar
ehostler ehostler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Annandale, VA
Age: 57
Posts: 15,212
Default

Call Headers By Ed. They aren't cheap; however, they can build you a perfect pair of fender well headers.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:22 PM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ehostler
Call Headers By Ed. They aren't cheap; however, they can build you a perfect pair of fender well headers.
E, have you ever actually heard of Ed making a custom header for a no-applicable car? This is from his website: "The above Automotive Header List is COMPLETE. No other automotive headers are available and no more NEW automotive header designs are planned."..."PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND: If you call us or e-mail us about unlisted headers, we will just tell you again what was said in the above paragraph so rather than waste your time and the cost of a phone call (or an e-mail message), ". And a 64-66 A is never mentioned in his online catalog...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2005, 01:49 AM
DartGT66 DartGT66 is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: vantaa,finland
Posts: 4,622
Default

My '66 had a weight distribution of 53% in front, 47% rear with the iron block. With the aluminum block it was 51/49. The engine was first a pump gas 493 and later a 528 with the 4.5" bore, the car weighed 3310 lbs with the driver, had a 8" converter, 4.10 sure grip rear and 13.5/30/15 DOT tires. I had problems with converters slipping, having thought about it later I propably should have used a bigger diameter one because of the low rpm nature of the enigne. It peaked at 6600 rpm and made over 700 ft-lb of torque, which are not figures good for a 8". It usually run low 10's in street trim, but with a certain ATI converter it run the best ET's of 9.69/142.5 mph, naturally aspirated & pump gas.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-30-2005, 01:11 AM
pishta's Avatar
pishta pishta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tustin, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 3,987
Default

Under the "better late than never" category...I didnt even realize my cap was off, Probably why it didnt start last night! Photo 2 is the money shot, notice the 1/4 inch clearance between the header and the jigsaw puzzle inner fender. Im going to add some tubular shock supports and make a wider inner fender, like our Finnish friend..but it still wont help where the A-arm bushings are , they cant be moved.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-06-2005, 09:29 PM
Rug_Trucker Rug_Trucker is offline
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Nashville TN
Posts: 774
Biggrin

Try Big Block Dart .Com I saw an early Valiant there with a 440 in it. Same as the early "Cuda.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1973 Cuda, Should I remove rusted floor pan before walnut blast 1973 Cuda. Jontemper73 Restoring your MoPar (Tricks & techniques) 5 05-17-2012 03:11 PM
1973 Plymouth Cuda Real “BS” Code Cuda Mopar Muscle Rear Wheel Drive - Vehicles For Sale 5 05-07-2012 03:50 PM
A body cuda or E body cuda which would you pick loki993 Vintage MOPAR chat 21 06-26-2008 06:26 AM
will 70 cuda bumpers fit on 73 cuda? cudagra Vintage MOPAR chat 1 12-13-2005 06:19 PM
Cuda steering column and other Cuda parts JJC Rear Wheel Drive - Parts Wanted 0 06-11-2004 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
. . . . .