|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Do you have a Centerforce?
I had been running the Centerforce 3 years, maybe six or seven times to the track. Always worked great. I thought the PP was going bad. Find out after taking it apart, the plate in the bell, for the arm that works the TO bearing was cracked, when it got hot it started bending, clutch would not work well.
I thought the PP was going bad. Bought a Hays street/strip "good for 500 hp" P.O.S.! Spun the first hard holeshot.. How much life does the Centerforce have in it? Should I put it back in? Thanks |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
i am planing on changeing my clutch,my tranny guy said center force was the best!any comments and advice will be much appreciated on what clutch to use on built 440,thanks!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Centerforce is the worst and that's even by Mopar Performance. THey do not hold as tight as a Borg and Beck unit which the type that came stock in all Mopars and it's what they still recomend. Look for a Ram or Mc Leod clutch in the Borg and Beck style and you wont go wrong.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I like Borg and Beck, I have a solid hub for oval track, seen one too many cluthes come apart and ruin a good night! Do I need a Ram or Mc Leod PP, or will a stock reman hold, on the dirt? It's 10.5"
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
DWC,
I know how you feel about clutches. The Hays I used is a Borg and Beck style. Its a pice of crap! Hays is owned by MR Gasket, who owns Mcleod I believe. The clutch engages way too low on the pedal. I could not power shift with it at all. The centerforce always worked flawlesly. I'm coming to understand I have over 450 hp easy. Don at FBO says the Centerforce is a POS too. But it works well. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
That book came out before Centerforce was ever though of. Cheap parts? Whats cheap about them DWC? I think you dont like them and dont have a good reason why. Tell us all why they are bad. Not just that they are. Why? Tell me your peersonal experience with them.
I have a scatter shield. How am I going to get hurt? You and Don are the only people who have said negative things about them. I know he's never had one... LOL! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
In fact, the only things the manual recommends against are 11" clutches in general and metallic disc materials. If you have any up to date MP material that says otherwise please state the exact publication. I might add that what MP advises against is routinely ignored by many because those who make the recommendations are often biased in their opinions just like message board "experts" and have been proven to be erroneous be actual trial. Diaphram clutches are routinely used behind 1000 foot pound torque diesels and they don't slip. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
LOL, busted once again??????????
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I am no expert, but I do own both type clutches and hands down my Centerforce is my favorite clutch. I have a BB type in three of my vehicles, and I hate them, I have no clue what my 95 ram has, but that thing will slip if I am hard on it, but I also cant complain as I have almost 200 thousand miles on that unit.
I vote put the centerforce back in, if it looks good, use it. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My rules had said your clutch/flywheel/press. plate gotta weigh x amount of weight, and that's when I bought the solid hub (from Mc Leod), but now, the rules just say mini clutch is legal, they combined hobby and superstock. I know the mini is best, but I guess since I already have the clutch, I could get the aluminum press plate and alum flywheel, or the lightweight steel one, or machine the heck out of a stock one, HOW FAR CAN YOU GO WITH THAT? MIN. WEIGHT? Heck, for that matter, doesn't that mean a person could run auto without the convertor, just the valve, I've seen that go fast! More $$$$ I'm not worried about messeng up my clutch on take off, but loading on the trailer don't wanna ride it. it's a go or no-go, not much in between. Sure, it says nothing NOW in the rules, but they make a rule if you go too fast. I'll probably get a b&b from Mc Leod, I hear the benifit of the diapram press. plate is less pedal pressure, the only experience I have with that was on a 89 Nissan truck a friend has, it had alot of miles, drove the hell outa it, and we pulled it out in pieces
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
! Quote:
! Quote:
! Quote:
And like our other friend always likes to say, where's you proof? |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
! Quote:
! Quote:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We tried to get around a rule one time. Rule said you only had to have a converter. So Freddy cut one up and gutted it and welded a tube in it. It would only hold abouot a thimble full of fluid in it, so it had this hollow clank to it. Worked good too. Tore it down one night and called it illegal, but by the rules it was not. They changed the rules for the next weekend and it said "Auto's must have a working converter." We won again and they tore us down thinking we had the converter in there again. Wrong, had a 3 spd. From then on that car had an auto and a 3 spd shifter in the floor and the clutch pedal was always in it too. They never knew what was in it. The 3spd stayed in it though and there money was taken ... lol. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Well, let's look at your first reply (#3) in this thread and I quote: "Centerforce is the worst and that's even by Mopar Performance." How else could one read that statement? You clearly state that MP considers Centerforce the "worst". If that's not what you meant maybe you need to learn how write. Quote:
If you're quoting from any literature with Direct Connection on the cover you're not up to date. Quote:
You mean the same cars that routinely get recalled by the factory because the designers and engineers made mistakes? If you have followed Mopar's recommendations for very long you'll find that they change direction quite often. I have reams of Mopar literature and in one book they'll tell you to do something and in another they'll tell you definitely to not do that. When the real world experiences differ with the recommendations of the manufacturer I'll go with experience and so will most others. Quote:
Not one single word that you have blathered in these diaphram clutch threads has any real meaning. Your supposed experience differs from others and your technical knowledge of the subject is nonexistent. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
when all the pushing and shoving is done,what clutch is prefered for street,light track use?
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Centerforce!! No matter what DWC says, they are good. I put my drag radials down to 16 psi. launched hard, power shifted through all gears and it still works well. Im putting it back in. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Centerforce!
As for diaphram clutches slipping in big trucks........... Last truck I drove, was a 99 T800, with a 15.8L 3406E, was 550HP, then re-programmed to 600HP when I got my new four axle pup. It had a 18 speed, (Do you know what that is dwc, and how it works?) and a diaphram clutch. The 600HP made 1950 ft pounds ot torque, btw, never had it slip, notta once, not even pulling a grade, downshifting from 8th over, down to 2nd direct, using the clutch to soften the shock................... Big truck clutches slip my ass.................. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
I hate my B and B type clutch in my Valaint, I drive it almost every day, and maybe this winter I am pulling the clutch out and putting a centerforce p plate in, as I like how my truck works with it. My other truck will get one someday too, as I hate that clutch also, and it too is a b and b type.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just more in a long line of B.S. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Think I'll stay away from the mini clutch, I know they are fast, but since i already have the solid hub, and lots of tracks wont let me use the mini, atleast in a hobby stock, just so happens my local track lets you get away with alot of stuff in hobby stock, but I'm not so sure they wont change a bunch of rules, with their new promoter, I'm prob. best to just mill a flywheel or pay the money for the 18lbs one, if it's even available, most tracks wont let me use aluminum flywheel, and they cost a small fortune anyway
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That's a pretty good idea especially if you plan on running at more than one track too. Not many places checks the cars though unless they put up the money to protest you unless if you run NASCAR like I do. THen you get checked everytime you turn around. Aluminum flywheel P3690469 11 lbs. Steel P4876047 18.5 lbs. Stock P4529142 30.0 lbs. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Sounds to me like its mostly prefrence. Both sides of the argument could do with a little more detailed information about what specifically about each type they like or don't like and how it affects the feel for the driver rather than the "yes it is!" "No it isn't!" stuff. Having not been around all that long, I've actually never owned a manual, but a four speed conversion might be in my future and I'd be more interested to hear about how each type reacts to the drivers interaction with the car rather than just insisting one or the other is going to blow up and kill them.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, we used to run figure eight at Colorado National Speedway, north of Denver, Nascar run-they would scale the car (all of them) before race, then like the top 5 or so, sometimes even not just top 5 if you ran REALLY good, and they had the typical stuff they looked at, see if you have the proper carb, then they would do other stuff, check compression, C.I.D.,you never knew what's next, that track had a big bump every time you got back onto the oval track, so they made the ride height 6 1/2 inches, that's not fun, atleast with the spindles we were using, they would not work at that height, had to get mid 70s b bodys spindles to raise the car up. But it was crazy fast on the few nights before we raised it up, ride height about 3 1/2 or 4, btw, we ran flowmasters, 2 1/4, with just 340 manifolds, everyone else ran headers
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
centerforce dualfriction | george a nilsen | Rear Wheel Drive - Parts for Sale | 0 | 11-01-2003 09:55 AM |
Centerforce Clutch | GS - | Dakota Truck Forum | 6 | 08-12-2002 12:52 AM |
Centerforce clutches? | 70Barracuda | Performance Talk | 3 | 06-20-2002 12:55 PM |
Ram vs. Centerforce | 70Barracuda | Performance Talk | 3 | 03-17-2002 09:28 AM |
CENTERFORCE | SIXPAK340 | Performance Talk | 12 | 01-28-2000 01:35 AM |